Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31176045›Full record

ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2019

Leveraging Surface Plasmon Resonance to Dissect the Interfacial Properties of Nanoparticles: Implications for Tissue Binding and Tumor Penetration.

Aniket S Wadajkar, Jimena G Dancy, Christine P Carney, Brian S Hampton, Heather M Ames, Jeffrey A Winkles, Graeme F Woodworth, Anthony J Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fn14-Targeted Gold Nanorods for Augmenting Laser Thermal Therapy for High-Grade Gliomas.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aniket S WadajkarMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jimena G DancyMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Christine P CarneyMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Brian S HamptonProtein Analysis Laboratory, Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Heather M AmesMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Jeffrey A WinklesMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Graeme F WoodworthMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Anthony J KimMarlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD; Department of Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: akim@som.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

EXPAND PARTICIPATION BY MINORITIES IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCER25GM055036 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI SUMMERS, MICHAEL FINLEY · 1996 to 2021
$16.9M
Training Grant in Cancer BiologyT32CA154274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Toni M Antalis, CURT I CIVIN · 2011 to 2026
$6.8M
Impact of Fn14-targeted Nanoparticles for Triple-Negative Breast CancerR37CA218617 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KIM, ANTHONY J. · 2018 to 2024
$2.4M
A Zeiss Duo Confocal Microscope for Shared Imaging FacilityS10RR024548 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BLANPIED, THOMAS A · 2008 to 2008
$500k
Fn14-targeted Therapeutics for Invasive Brain CancerK25EB018370 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KIM, ANTHONY J. · 2014 to 2016
$390k
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA218617NCI NIH HHS T32 CA154274NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR024548NIBIB NIH HHS K25 EB018370NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM055036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic efficacy of nanoparticle-drug formulations for cancer applications is significantly impacted by the extent of intra-tumoral accumulation and tumor tissue penetration. We advanced the application of surface plasmon resonance to examine interfacial properties of various clinical and emerging nanoparticles related to tumor tissue penetration. We observed that amine-terminated or positively-charged dendrimers and liposomes bound strongly to tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, whereas hydroxyl/carboxyl-terminated dendrimers and PEGylated/neutrally-charged liposomes did not bind. In addition, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles formulated with cholic acid or F127 surfactants bound strongly to tumor ECM proteins, whereas nanoparticles formulated with poly(vinyl alcohol) did not bind. Unexpectedly, following blood serum incubation, this binding increased and particle transport in ex vivo tumor tissues reduced markedly. Finally, we characterized the protein corona on PLGA nanoparticles using quantitative proteomics. Through these studies, we identified valuable criteria for particle surface characteristics that are likely to mediate their tissue binding and tumor penetration.

Indexed as

Surface Plasmon ResonanceAnimalsBiological TransportBlood ProteinsCell Line, TumorDendrimersExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFemaleHumansLiposomesMice, NudeNanoparticlesNeoplasmsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerProtein BindingProtein CoronaBlood ProteinsDendrimersExtracellular Matrix ProteinsLiposomesPAMAM StarburstPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerProtein CoronaSurface-Active AgentsNanoparticlesNon-specific bindingProtein coronaProteomicsSurface plasmon resonance (SPR)Tumor penetration

Identifiers

PMID31176045
PMCPMC6702074
OpenAlexW2950187185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.