ArticleNeuroImage2019
High-fidelity mapping of repetition-related changes in the parietal memory network.
Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrophysiological dissociation of human posterior cingulate cortex contributions to value- and memory-based decision-making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Old-New Recognition Memory Revisited.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Functions of the posterior cingulate cortex and default network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2025Article
- How gist and association affect false memory: False recognition and gist rating norms.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Situating the salience and parietal memory networks in the context of multiple parallel distributed networks using precision functional mapping.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Specialization of the human hippocampal long axis revisited.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The promise of precision functional mapping for neuroimaging in psychiatry.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Peering into the future: Eye movements predict neural repetition effects during episodic simulation.Neuropsychologia · 2024Article
- Dissociable Contributions of the Medial Parietal Cortex to Recognition Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Specialization of the Human Hippocampal Long Axis Revisited.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- A tripartite view of the posterior cingulate cortex.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Parallel hippocampal-parietal circuits for self- and goal-oriented processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Distinct subdivisions of human medial parietal cortex support recollection of people and places.eLife · 2019Article
- Identifying task-general effects of stimulus familiarity in the parietal memory network.Neuropsychologia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
fMRI studies of human memory have identified a "parietal memory network" (PMN) that displays distinct responses to novel and familiar stimuli, typically deactivating during initial encoding but robustly activating during retrieval. The small size of PMN regions, combined with their proximity to the neighboring default mode network, makes a targeted assessment of their responses in highly sampled subjects important for understanding information processing within the network. Here, we describe an experiment in which participants made semantic decisions about repeatedly-presented stimuli, assessing PMN BOLD responses as items transitioned from experimentally novel to repeated. Data are from the highly-sampled subjects in the Midnight Scan Club dataset, enabling a characterization of BOLD responses at both the group and single-subject level. Across all analyses, PMN regions deactivated in response to novel stimuli and displayed changes in BOLD activity across presentations, but did not significantly activate to repeated items. Results support only a portion of initially hypothesized effects, in particular suggesting that novelty-related deactivations may be less susceptible to attentional/task manipulations than are repetition-related activations within the network. This in turn suggests that novelty and familiarity may be processed as separable entities within the PMN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.