ReviewStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2019
Concise Review: A Critical Evaluation of Criteria Used to Define Salivary Gland Stem Cells.
Review in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- SOX2 and cytokeratins 5, 8 and 18 as potential stem cell biomarkers in botryoid odontogenic, lateral periodontal and gingival cysts.Histology and histopathology · 2026Article
- Salivary gland cell senescence in Sjögren's syndrome: current research and novel therapeutic directions.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2025Review
- Primary Sjögren's syndrome: new perspectives on salivary gland epithelial cells.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
- Adult Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Oral Cavity and Surrounding Areas: Types and Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Minor salivary gland stem cells: a comparative study of the biological properties under clinical-grade culture conditions.Cell and tissue research · 2023Article
- Autologous mesenchymal stem cells offer a new paradigm for salivary gland regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2023Review
- MUC1 and Polarity Markers INADL and SCRIB Identify Salivary Ductal Cells.Journal of dental research · 2022Article
- Bioengineering in salivary gland regeneration.Journal of biomedical science · 2022Review
- Tracking of Oral and Craniofacial Stem Cells in Tissue Development, Regeneration, and Diseases.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021Review
- Cell signaling regulation in salivary gland development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- The evolving definition of salivary gland stem cells.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the effort to develop cell-based therapies to treat salivary gland dysfunction, many different populations of cells in the adult salivary glands have been proposed as stem cells. These cell populations vary, depending on the assay used, and are often nonoverlapping, leading to the conclusion that salivary glands harbor multiple stem cells. The goal of this review is to critically appraise the assays and properties used to identify stem cells in the adult salivary gland, and to consider the caveats of each. Re-evaluation of the defining criteria may help to reconcile the many potential stem cell populations described in the salivary gland, in order to increase comparability between studies and build consensus in the field. Stem Cells 2019;37:1144-1150.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.