Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175671›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2019

Toward a Consensus on Applying Quantitative Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomics in Translational Pharmacology Research: A White Paper.

Bhagwat Prasad, Brahim Achour, Per Artursson, Cornelis E C A Hop, Yurong Lai, Philip C Smith, Jill Barber, Jacek R Wisniewski, Daniel Spellman, Yasuo Uchida and 3 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Targeted proteomics for cancer biomarker verification and validation.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bhagwat PrasadDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Brahim AchourCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Per ArturssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Cornelis E C A HopGenentech, South San Francisco, California, USA.
Yurong LaiGilead Sciences, Foster City, California, USA.
Philip C SmithEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jill BarberCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jacek R WisniewskiBiochemical Proteomics Group, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Daniel SpellmanPharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics & Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yasuo UchidaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Michael A ZientekTakeda California, San Diego, California, USA.
Jashvant D UnadkatDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Amin Rostami-HodjeganCentre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Understanding Fetal Exposure to Cannabinoids Through In Vitro and In Vivo StudiesP01DA032507 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI UNADKAT, JASHVANT D · 2013 to 2023
$12.4M
PBPK prediction of ontogeny mediated alteration in hepatic drug eliminationR01HD081299 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PRASAD, BHAGWAT · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081299NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA032507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative translation of information on drug absorption, disposition, receptor engagement, and drug-drug interactions from bench to bedside requires models informed by physiological parameters that link in vitro studies to in vivo outcomes. To predict in vivo outcomes, biochemical data from experimental systems are routinely scaled using protein quantity in these systems and relevant tissues. Although several laboratories have generated useful quantitative proteomic data using state-of-the-art mass spectrometry, no harmonized guidelines exit for sample analysis and data integration to in vivo translation practices. To address this gap, a workshop was held on September 27 and 28, 2018, in Cambridge, MA, with 100 experts attending from academia, the pharmaceutical industry, and regulators. Various aspects of quantitative proteomics and its applications in translational pharmacology were debated. A summary of discussions and best practices identified by this expert panel are presented in this "White Paper" alongside unresolved issues that were outlined for future debates.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidHumansPharmacokineticsPharmacologyProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID31175671
PMCPMC6692196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.