ReviewUpdates in surgery2019
The diagnosis and management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: has progress been made?
Review in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- [Intraductal neoplasms of the pancreas].Der Pathologe · 2021Review
- Analyzing and predicting the LNM rate and prognosis of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- A retrospective study of histological outcome for IPMN after surgery in Lausanne, Switzerland: A case series.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas are premalignant mucin-producing epithelial tumors that arise from the pancreatic ductal system. These cystic tumors represent 15-30% of cystic lesions of the pancreas [Basturk et al. in Am J Surg Pathol 39(12):1730-1741, 1; Ferrone et al. in Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill: 1960) 144(5):448-454, 2, Kosmahl et al. in Virchows Arch Int J Pathol 445(2):168-178, 3; Spinelli et al. in Ann Surg. 239(5):651-657, 4]. It is believed that IPMN can progress from low-grade dysplasia to high-grade dysplasia to invasive cancer, and this pathway of progression accounts for 20-30% of pancreatic cancer [Adsay et al. in Am J Surg Pathol 28(7):839-848, 5; Tanaka et al. in J Gastroenterol 40(7):669-675, 6; Wu et al. in Sci Transl Med 3(92):92ra66, 7]. Furthermore, it is also widely believed that IPMN represent a field defect of the pancreas in which the entire ductal system is at risk of developing invasive carcinoma, not only in the area of radiographically detectable IPMN, and thus the remaining gland should undergo surveillance after partial pancreatectomy [Salvia et al. in Ann Surg 239(5):678-685, 8; Izawa et al. in Cancer 92(7):1807-1817, 9; Yamaguchi and Tanaka in Jpn J Clin Oncol 41(7):836-840, 10]. Increasingly, surgeons are faced with the dilemma between recommending highly complex resections-that have significant morbidity and mortality-in patients who may have low-risk IPMN (low-grade dysplasia), or alternatively, recommending observation for those who could possibly be harboring a radiographically occult malignancy. Given the complexity of the management decisions for patients with IPMN, the purpose of this paper is to review the current literature and to provide a summary of how accurate we are currently with the identification of high-grade dysplasia or progression to carcinoma in patients who present with IPMN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.