ReviewDrugs & aging2019
Going Beyond the Guidelines in Individualising the Use of Antihypertensive Drugs in Older Patients.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Review of Clinical Trial and Meta-Analyses of BP Treatment Strategies for Patients with Orthostatic Hypotension: Blood Pressure Management in Patients with Hypertension and Orthostatic Hypotension.Current hypertension reports · 2026Pooled it
- Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacist-led deprescribing of cardiovascular and diabetes medication within a clinical medication review: the LeMON study (Less Medicines in Older Patients in the Netherlands), a cluster randomized controlled trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Trial
- Desprescribing antihypertensives in older people in primary care: subgroup analysis of the MINOR randomised clinical trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Trial
- Hypertension management in the oldest-old: a survey of physicians in Swedish primary health care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention Focused on the Deprescribing of Cardiovascular and Antidiabetic Medication in Older Patients With Polypharmacy: Patients' and Pharmacists' Experiences.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Consensus statement on practical guidance for optimizing antihypertensive therapy in older adults needing nursing care by the Japan Geriatrics Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension: English translation of the Japanese article.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Consensus Statement on Practical Guidance for Optimizing Antihypertensive Therapy in Older Adults Needing Nursing Care by the Japan Geriatrics Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension: English Translation of the Japanese Article.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Among Adults Aged 80 and Above: Findings From the Population-Based German Health Survey Gesundheit 65.International journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- Deprescribing Hypertension Medication in Older Adults: Can It Lower Drug Burden Without Causing Harm?Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2024Review
- New horizons in clinical practice guidelines for use with older people.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Deprescribing antihypertensive drugs in frail older adults.Australian prescriber · 2024Review
- Centrally acting antihypertensives and alpha-blockers in people at risk of falls: therapeutic dilemmas-a clinical review.European geriatric medicine · 2023Review
- Preferences for deprescribing antihypertensive medications amongst clinicians, carers and people living with dementia: a discrete choice experiment.Age and ageing · 2023Article
- Antihypertensive Deprescribing in Older Adults: a Practical Guide.Current hypertension reports · 2022Review
- Hypertension treatment in the oldest-old: focus group interviews with Swedish general practitioners.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Article
- Antihypertensive medication in frail older adults: A narrative review through a deprescribing lens.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Characterising older adults' risk of harm from blood-pressure lowering medications: a sub-analysis from the PRIME study.Age and ageing · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension is commonly diagnosed in older patients, with increasing cardiovascular (CV) risk as systolic blood pressure (BP) increases. Maximising CV risk reduction must be reconciled with minimising the risk of treatment-related harms and burden, especially among frail, multi-morbid and older old patients who have been excluded from most randomised trials. Contemporary clinical guidelines, based on such trials, differ in their recommendations as to threshold levels warranting treatment with antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) and target levels that should be achieved. In optimising AHD prescribing in older patients, we propose the following decision framework: decide therapeutic goals in accordance with patient characteristics and preferences; estimate absolute CV risk; measure and profile BP accurately in ways that account for lability in BP levels and minimise error in BP measurement; determine threshold and target BP levels likely to confer net benefit, taking into account age, co-morbidities, frailty and cognitive function; and consider situations that warrant AHD deprescribing on the basis of potential current or future harm. In applying this framework to older persons, and based on a review of relevant randomised trials and observational studies, individuals most likely to benefit from treating systolic BP to no less than 130 mmHg are those of any age who are fit and have high baseline systolic BP (≥ 160 mmHg); high CV risk, i.e. established CV disease or risk of CV events exceeding 20% at 10 years; previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack; heart failure; and stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease with proteinuria. Individuals most likely to be harmed from treating BP to target systolic < 140 mmHg are those who have no CV disease and aged over 80 years; moderate to severe frailty, cognitive impairment or functional limitations; labile BP and/or history of orthostatic hypotension, syncope and falls; or life expectancy < 12 months. Treatment should never be so intense as to reduce diastolic BP to < 60 mmHg in any older person. At a time when guidelines are calling for less conservative management of hypertension in all age groups, we contend that a more temperate approach, such as that offered here and based on the totality of available evidence, may assist in maximising net benefit in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31175614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.