Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175554›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2019

Contrasting Effects of Gambling Consumption and Gambling Problems on Subjective Wellbeing.

Amanda Blackman, Matthew Browne, Matthew Rockloff, Nerilee Hing, Alex M T Russell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Gambling Behavior and Subjective Well-Being.Journal of gambling studies · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Evolution of Gambling-Related Harm Measurement: Lessons from the Last Decade.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda BlackmanSchool of Medical, Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, B8 G.47 University Drive, Bundaberg, QLD, 4670, Australia.
Matthew BrowneSchool of Medical, Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, B8 G.47 University Drive, Bundaberg, QLD, 4670, Australia. m.browne@cqu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-6229
Matthew RockloffSchool of Medical, Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, B8 G.47 University Drive, Bundaberg, QLD, 4670, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0080-2690
Nerilee HingSchool of Medical, Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, B8 G.47 University Drive, Bundaberg, QLD, 4670, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-9784
Alex M T RussellSchool of Medical, Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, B8 G.47 University Drive, Bundaberg, QLD, 4670, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-7220

Funding

Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation (AU) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most research on gambling focuses on the negative consequences associated with excessive consumption, which implicitly leads to a reduction in health and wellbeing. However, few studies have measured subjective wellbeing with respect to gambling involvement, and almost none has attempted to distinguish the separate effects of consumption and problems. We used the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) in two surveys with different recruitment criteria. Study 1 (N = 1524, 50.6% female) was designed to compare differences in personal wellbeing among gamblers, and Study 2 (N = 1586, 70.2% female) compared wellbeing between gamblers and non-gamblers. Participants provided demographic information, and answered questions allowing them to be grouped into high/low levels of consumption, and problem gambling risk categories. After accounting for gambling problems, higher consumption was associated with higher wellbeing. Study 2 showed consistent results; revealing that both high and low consumption non-problem gamblers (NPGs) had higher personal wellbeing than non-gamblers. Nevertheless, the deleterious effect of gambling problems on wellbeing was larger than the effect of consumption. After accounting for population prevalence (i.e., per capita), only 15.3% of the negative influence of gambling problems on PWI was attributable to problem gamblers; the remainder associated with lower risk categories. Although results were consistent when controlling for demographic covariates, the positive link between consumption and wellbeing may be due to unmeasured variables such as personality traits, health, and socioeconomic status. Nevertheless, the assessment of subjective wellbeing provides a unique perspective on both the positive and negative effects of gambling.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionAdultAttitude to HealthBehavior, AddictiveFemaleGamblingHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRiskSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultConsumptionGambling problemsHarmsPWIQuality of lifeRecreational gamblingSubjective wellbeing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.