ArticleJournal of medical systems2019
IAPSO-AIRS: A novel improved machine learning-based system for wart disease treatment.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Path planning and engineering problems of 3D UAV based on adaptive coati optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in assisting pathogenic microorganism diagnosis and treatment: a review of infectious skin diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- UncertaintyFuseNet: Robust uncertainty-aware hierarchical feature fusion model with Ensemble Monte Carlo Dropout for COVID-19 detection.An international journal on information fusion · 2023Article
- DUNEScan: a web server for uncertainty estimation in skin cancer detection with deep neural networks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A dynamic center and multi threshold point based stable feature extraction network for driver fatigue detection utilizing EEG signals.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2021Article
- A Hybrid Scheme for Heart Disease Diagnosis Using Rough Set and Cuckoo Search Technique.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wart disease (WD) is a skin illness on the human body which is caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). This study mainly concentrates on common and plantar warts. There are various treatment methods for this disease, including the popular immunotherapy and cryotherapy methods. Manual evaluation of the WD treatment response is challenging. Furthermore, traditional machine learning methods are not robust enough in WD classification as they cannot deal effectively with small number of attributes. This study proposes a new evolutionary-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system using machine learning to classify the WD treatment response. The main architecture of our CAD system is based on the combination of improved adaptive particle swarm optimization (IAPSO) algorithm and artificial immune recognition system (AIRS). The cross-validation protocol was applied to test our machine learning-based classification system, including five different partition protocols (K2, K3, K4, K5 and K10). Our database consisted of 180 records taken from immunotherapy and cryotherapy databases. The best results were obtained using the K10 protocol that provided the precision, recall, F-measure and accuracy values of 0.8908, 0.8943, 0.8916 and 90%, respectively. Our IAPSO system showed the reliability of 98.68%. It was implemented in Java, while integrated development environment (IDE) was implemented using NetBeans. Our encouraging results suggest that the proposed IAPSO-AIRS system can be employed for the WD management in clinical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.