Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175451›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Correlation between pre-operative CT findings and intra-operative features in pediatric cholesteatoma: a retrospective study on 26 patients.

Gabriele Molteni, Cristoforo Fabbris, Giulia Molinari, Matteo Alicandri-Ciufelli, Livio Presutti, Daniele Paltrinieri, Daniele Marchioni

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Follow-up strategies in pediatric cholesteatoma: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriele MolteniOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Cristoforo FabbrisOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy. cristoforo.fabbris@student.unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-9802
Giulia MolinariOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Largo del Pozzo, 71, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Matteo Alicandri-CiufelliOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Largo del Pozzo, 71, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Livio PresuttiOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Modena, Largo del Pozzo, 71, 41125, Modena, Italy.
Daniele PaltrinieriIT Department, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Daniele MarchioniOtorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani, 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the predictive value of pre-operative CT imaging in pediatric patients affected by cholesteatoma of the middle ear, comparing pre-operative CT findings to intra-operative features.

methodsA retrospective study was performed on a population of 26 pediatric patients who underwent tympanoplasty for middle ear cholesteatoma at the Otorhinolaryngology Departments of Verona and Modena University Hospitals between December 2011 and June 2018. Comparison between pre-operative CT images and intra-operative findings (assessed from video recording) was made focusing on the involvement of specific structures: ossicular chain, tegmen tympani, labyrinthine fistula, facial nerve, and temporal bone involvement. CT sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

resultsOverall, 28 surgical procedures were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were encountered between CT images and intra-operatory findings regarding the selected parameters.

conclusionsBased on our study, pre-operative temporal bone CT scan is a valuable tool for the assessment of pediatric patient candidates for cholesteatoma surgery given the absence of statistically significant differences between radiologic and intra-operative findings. The present findings might support the indication to routinely perform temporal bone CT scan in children with cholesteatoma as part of pre-surgical plan. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Preoperative CareTomography, X-Ray ComputedTympanoplastyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCholesteatoma, Middle EarEar, MiddleFemaleHumansIntraoperative PeriodMaleRetrospective StudiesTemporal BoneVideo RecordingCT imagingEndoscopyIntra-operative findingsPediatric cholesteatomaTympanoplasty

Identifiers

PMID31175451
OpenAlexW2957029103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.