Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175421›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

The sentinel stent? A systematic review of the role of prophylactic ureteric stenting prior to colorectal resections.

Stefanie M Croghan, Alexandra Zaborowski, Helen M Mohan, David Mulvin, Barry B McGuire, Michael Murphy, David J Galvin, Gerry Lennon, David Quinlan, Des C Winter

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Iatrogenic ureteral injury in colorectal surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis of risk factors and preventive strategies.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Morbidity and predictors of delayed recognition of iatrogenic ureteric injuries.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefanie M CroghanDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland. stefaniecroghan@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-3682
Alexandra ZaborowskiDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Helen M MohanDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
David MulvinDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Barry B McGuireDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael MurphyDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
David J GalvinDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerry LennonDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
David QuinlanDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin, Ireland.
Des C WinterDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
St. Vincent's University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose'Prophylactic' ureteric stents potentially reduce rates, and facilitate intraoperative recognition, of iatrogenic ureteric injury (IUI) during colorectal resections. A lack of consensus surrounds the risk-benefit equation of this practice, and we aimed to assess the evidence base.

methodsA systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched using terms 'ureteric/ureteral/JJ/Double J stent' or 'ureteric/ureteral catheter' and 'colorectal/prophylactic/resection/diverticular disease/diverticulitis/iatrogenic injury'. Primary outcomes were rates of ureteric injuries and their intraoperative identification. Secondary outcomes included stent complication rates.

resultsWe identified 987 publications; 22 papers met the inclusion criteria. No randomised controlled trials were found. The total number of patients pooled for evaluation was 869,603 (102,370 with ureteric stents/catheters, 767,233 controls). The most frequent indications for prophylactic stents were diverticular disease (45.38%), neoplasia (33.45%) and inflammatory bowel disease (9.37%). Pooled results saw IUI in 1521/102,370 (1.49%) with, and in 1333/767,233 (0.17%) without, prophylactic ureteric stents. Intraoperative recognition of IUIs occurred in 10/16 injuries (62.5%) with prophylactic stents, versus 9/17 (52.94%) without stents (p = 0.579). The most serious complications of prophylactic stent use were ureteric injury (2/1716, 0.12%) and transient ureteric obstruction following stent removal (13/666, 1.95%).

conclusionsPlacement of prophylactic ureteric stents has a low complication rate. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that stents decrease ureteric injury or increase intraoperative detection of IUIs. Apparently higher rates of IUI in stented patients likely reflect use in higher risk resections. A prospective registry with harmonised data collection points and stratification of intraoperative risk is needed.

Indexed as

StentsAgedCatheterizationColorectal NeoplasmsCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUreterColorectalIatrogenic injuryResectionStentUreter

Identifiers

PMID31175421
OpenAlexW2950550862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.