ArticleExperimental brain research2019
Superconditioning TMS for examining upper motor neuron function in MND.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting motor unit recruitment to TMS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cortical inhibition is retained during voluntary contractions.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation: interpreting a simple measure of a complex system.The Journal of physiology · 2023Review
- On the Use of TMS to Investigate the Pathophysiology of Neurodegenerative Diseases.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex, including a novel four-pulse superconditioning (TMSsc) paradigm, in repeated examinations of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in eight subjects with motor neuron disease (MND), including seven with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The goals were: (1) to look for evidence of cortical hyperexcitability, including a reduction in short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI); and (2) to examine the utility of using TMSsc for quantifying upper motor neuron function during MND progression. Testing of abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles bilaterally was carried out every 3 months in MND subjects for up to 2 years; results were compared to those from a cohort of 15 control subjects. Measures of SICI were not significantly different between control and MND subjects for either APB or TA muscles. Other measures of cortical excitability, including TMS threshold and MEP amplitude, were consistent with lowered cortical excitability in MND subjects. Certain combinations of superconditioning TMS were capable of causing stronger inhibition or facilitation of MEPs compared to dual-pulse TMS, for both APB and TA target muscles. Moreover, there were multiple cases in which target muscles unresponsive to strong single-pulse TMS, whether at rest or when tested with an active contraction, showed an MEP in response to TMSsc optimized for facilitation. Our findings suggest that a multi-faceted neurophysiologic protocol for examining upper motor neuron function in MND subjects might benefit from inclusion of TMSsc testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.