Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175366›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

Effect of ruminally protected arginine and lysine supplementation on serum amino acids, performance, and carcass traits of feedlot steers1.

Priscilla Dutra Teixeira, Jessica A Tekippe, Liziana Maria Rodrigues, Marcio Machado Ladeira, Josey R Pukrop, Y H Brad Kim, Jon P Schoonmaker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploration of Microencapsulation of Arginine in Carnauba Wax (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. L-Arginine Nutrition and Metabolism in Ruminants.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Priscilla Dutra TeixeiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Jessica A TekippeAjinomoto Heartland LLC, Chicago, IL.
Liziana Maria RodriguesDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Marcio Machado LadeiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Josey R PukropDepartment of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Y H Brad KimDepartment of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Jon P SchoonmakerDepartment of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USUniversidade Federal de Lavras · BRAjinomoto (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One hundred twenty Angus × Simmental steers [322 ± 4.8 kg initial body weight (BW)] were blocked by BW and randomly allocated to 4 treatments arranged as a 2 × 2 factorial to evaluate the effects of supplemental arginine (none or 63 g/d of a 15.6% metabolizable arginine), supplemental lysine (none or 40 g/d of a 25% metabolizable lysine), and their interaction on performance and carcass composition of feedlot steers during a 170-d feeding period. The basal diet [dry matter (DM) basis] contained 52% dry-rolled corn, 22% dried distillers grains with solubles, 20% corn silage, and 6% vitamin-mineral supplement. Lysine balance was estimated to be -10.3 to -10.8 g for diets that did not contain supplemental lysine, and arginine supply was estimated to be +9.7 g for diets that did not contain supplemental arginine during period 1 (days 0 to 87). Lysine and arginine supplies met or exceeded requirements in period 2 (days 88 to 170). Rumen-protected arginine and lysine were top dressed daily until slaughter at a common BW (622 ± 5.5 kg). Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Body weight, average daily gain, and DM intake were not affected (P ≥ 0.14) by arginine or lysine supplementation. However, lysine increased gain:feed (P = 0.05) during period 1. Lysine decreased serum urea nitrogen (P = 0.03) on day 87, increased (P = 0.01) longissimus muscle (LM) area, decreased (P ≤ 0.01) fat thickness and yield grade, and tended (P = 0.06) to increase moisture content of LM steaks. There tended to be an interaction for moisture content of steaks (P = 0.09), where arginine supplementation increased moisture content to a greater extent in steaks from cattle supplemented with lysine compared with steaks from cattle not fed supplemental lysine. Arginine tended to increase the proportion of Choice grade carcasses (P = 0.09) but did not change lipid content of steaks (P = 0.59). Arginine tended to decrease serum glutamate (P = 0.09) and lysine (P = 0.07) after 87 d of feeding. In conclusion, supplemental rumen-protected arginine and lysine did not improve performance, but lysine can increase carcass muscle and leanness, and although arginine did not increase lipid content of steaks, it may favorably shift carcasses to a greater quality grade.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAmino AcidsAnimal FeedAnimalsArginineBlood Urea NitrogenBody CompositionCattleDietLysineMaleRed MeatRumenSilageZea maysAmino AcidsArginineLysineargininebeef feedlotgrowthlysinemeat quality

Identifiers

PMID31175366
PMCPMC6667248
OpenAlexW2904456951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.