Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175304›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Adaptation of the human auditory cortex to changing background noise.

Bahar Khalighinejad, Jose L Herrero, Ashesh D Mehta, Nima Mesgarani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reduced Neural Responses to Natural Foreground versus Background Sounds in the Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Noise schemas aid hearing in noise.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Attention-Driven Modulation of Auditory Cortex Activity during Selective Listening in a Multispeaker Setting.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  16. Dissociable Roles of the Auditory Midbrain and Cortex in Processing the Statistical Features of Natural Sound Textures.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bahar KhalighinejadMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Jose L HerreroHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, 11549, USA.
Ashesh D MehtaHofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, 11549, USA.
Nima MesgaraniMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA. nima@ee.columbia.edu.

Funding

Neurophysiology of robust speech perception in human superior temporal gyrusR01DC014279 · NIDCD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Nima MESGARANI · 2015 to 2026
$5.3M
Neurophysiology of auditory emotion recognition in the human brainR21MH114166 · NIMH · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI MEHTA, ASHESH DINESH · 2017 to 2018
$456k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014279NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH114166U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) R21MH114166U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) DC014279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech communication in real-world environments requires adaptation to changing acoustic conditions. How the human auditory cortex adapts as a new noise source appears in or disappears from the acoustic scene remain unclear. Here, we directly measured neural activity in the auditory cortex of six human subjects as they listened to speech with abruptly changing background noises. We report rapid and selective suppression of acoustic features of noise in the neural responses. This suppression results in enhanced representation and perception of speech acoustic features. The degree of adaptation to different background noises varies across neural sites and is predictable from the tuning properties and speech specificity of the sites. Moreover, adaptation to background noise is unaffected by the attentional focus of the listener. The convergence of these neural and perceptual effects reveals the intrinsic dynamic mechanisms that enable a listener to filter out irrelevant sound sources in a changing acoustic scene.

Indexed as

NoiseAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAttentionAuditory CortexDrug Resistant EpilepsyElectrocorticographyFemaleHumansMaleSpeech AcousticsSpeech Perception

Identifiers

PMID31175304
PMCPMC6555798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.