Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175293›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Comprehensive study of nuclear receptor DNA binding provides a revised framework for understanding receptor specificity.

Ashley Penvose, Jessica L Keenan, David Bray, Vijendra Ramlall, Trevor Siggers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashley PenvoseDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9448-9094
Jessica L KeenanBiological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5012-662X
David BrayBiological Design Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Vijendra RamlallDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-7184
Trevor SiggersDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. tsiggers@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-7639
Boston University · US

Funding

Gene Regulation in the Immune SystemR01AI116829 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SIGGERS, TREVOR · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Gene Regulation in the Immune SystemR56AI116829 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SIGGERS, TREVOR · 2015 to 2015
$369k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI116829U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) R01A116829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The type II nuclear receptors (NRs) function as heterodimeric transcription factors with the retinoid X receptor (RXR) to regulate diverse biological processes in response to endogenous ligands and therapeutic drugs. DNA-binding specificity has been proposed as a primary mechanism for NR gene regulatory specificity. Here we use protein-binding microarrays (PBMs) to comprehensively analyze the DNA binding of 12 NR:RXRα dimers. We find more promiscuous NR-DNA binding than has been reported, challenging the view that NR binding specificity is defined by half-site spacing. We show that NRs bind DNA using two distinct modes, explaining widespread NR binding to half-sites in vivo. Finally, we show that the current models of NR specificity better reflect binding-site activity rather than binding-site affinity. Our rich dataset and revised NR binding models provide a framework for understanding NR regulatory specificity and will facilitate more accurate analyses of genomic datasets.

Indexed as

DNADNA-Binding ProteinsHumansLiver X ReceptorsMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Retinoic AcidReceptors, Thyroid HormoneRetinoid X ReceptorsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsLiver X ReceptorsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, CalcitriolReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Retinoic AcidReceptors, Thyroid HormoneRetinoid X Receptors

Identifiers

PMID31175293
PMCPMC6555819
OpenAlexW2948278085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.