ReviewTranslational psychiatry2019
Reporting guidelines on remotely collected electronic mood data in mood disorder (eMOOD)-recommendations.
Review in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Dropout, Attrition, Adherence, and Compliance in Mood Monitoring and Ambulatory Assessment Studies for Depression and Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Mood Monitoring, Mood Tracking, and Ambulatory Assessment Interventions in Depression and Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Adverse Events of Mood Monitoring and Ambulatory Assessment in Depression and Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mental health · 2025Pooled it
- The User Experience of Ambulatory Assessment and Mood Monitoring in Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Smartphone-based interventions in bipolar disorder: Systematic review and meta-analyses of efficacy. A position paper from the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Big Data Task Force.Bipolar disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment including clinical feedback in progressed bipolar disorder: the SmartBipolar trial randomised controlled parallel-group trial.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2026Article
- Performance of active and passive ambulatory assessment measures and mood monitoring in bipolar disorder: a systematic review.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2026Review
- The user experience of ambulatory assessment and mood monitoring in depression: a systematic review & meta-synthesis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Statistical Conceptualisation of Mood Instability: A Systematic Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- The MinDag app for symptom monitoring and feedback to patients and clinicians during the initial treatment of bipolar disorder - a feasibility study.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- Effects of low-dose aspirin in bipolar disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the A-Bipolar RCT).BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Early trajectory of clinical global impression as a transdiagnostic predictor of psychiatric hospitalisation: a retrospective cohort study.The lancet. Psychiatry · 2023Article
- Article
- Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- Identifying psychiatric diagnosis from missing mood data through the use of log-signature features.PloS one · 2022Article
- A digital self-report survey of mood for bipolar disorder.Bipolar disorders · 2021Article
- The Use of Music in the Treatment and Management of Serious Mental Illness: A Global Scoping Review of the Literature.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prospective monitoring of mood was started by Kraepelin who made and recorded frequent observations of his patients. During the last decade, the number of research studies using remotely collected electronic mood data has increased markedly. However, standardized measures and methods to collect, analyze and report electronic mood data are lacking. To get better understanding of the nature, correlates and implications of mood and mood instability, and to standardize this process, we propose guidelines for reporting of electronic mood data (eMOOD). This paper provides an overview of remotely collected electronic mood data in mood disorders and discusses why standardized reporting is necessary to evaluate and inform mood research in Psychiatry. Adherence to these guidelines will improve interpretation, reproducibility and future meta-analyses of mood monitoring in mood disorder research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.