Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175200›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Understanding people who self-referred in an emergency department with primary care problems during office hours: a qualitative interview study at a Daytime General Practice Cooperative in two hospitals in The Hague, The Netherlands.

Rosa Naomi Naomi Minderhout, Pien Venema, Hedwig M M Vos, Jojanneke Kant, Marc Abraham Bruijnzeels, Mattijs E Numans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Patients' perceptions on reasons for self-referring to the emergency department shortly before a cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosa Naomi Naomi MinderhoutDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ LUMC-Campus, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands.
Pien VenemaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ LUMC-Campus, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands.
Hedwig M M VosDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ LUMC-Campus, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands.
Jojanneke KantSMASH, a General Practice Service, The Hague, Netherlands.
Marc Abraham BruijnzeelsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ LUMC-Campus, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands.
Mattijs E NumansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ LUMC-Campus, Leiden University Medical Centre, The Hague, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NLSociété de Mathématiques Appliquées et de Sciences Humaines · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide insight into the motives for hospital self-referral during office hours and the barriers deterring general practitioner (GP) consultation with a primary care request.

settingPeople who self-referred at a Daytime General Practice Cooperative (GPC) in two hospitals in The Hague, The Netherlands.

participantsA total of 44 people who self-referred were interviewed in two hospitals. The average age of interviewees was 35 years (range 19 months to 83 years), a parent of a young patient was interviewed, but the age of patients is shown here. There were more male patients (66%) than female patients (34%). Patients were recruited using a sampling method after triage. Triage was the responsibility of an emergency department (ED) nurse in one hospital and of a GP in the other. Those excluded from participation included (a) children under the age of 18 years and not accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, (b) foreign patients not resident in the Netherlands, (c) patients unable to communicate in Dutch or English and (d) patients directly referred to the ED after triage by the GP (in one hospital).

resultsPeople who self-referred generally reported several motives for going to the hospital directly. Information and awareness factors played an important role, often related to a lack of information regarding where to go with a medical complaint. Furthermore, many people who self-referred mentioned hospital facilities, convenience and perceived medical necessity as motivational factors. Barriers deterring a visit to the own GP were mainly logistical, including not being registered with a GP, the GP was too far away, poor GP telephone accessibility or a waiting list for an appointment.

conclusionInformation and awareness factors contribute to misperceptions among people who self-referred concerning the complaint, the GP and the hospital. As a range of motivational factors are involved, there is no straightforward solution. However, better dissemination of information might alleviate misconceptions and contribute to providing the right care to the right patient in the right setting.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth Services MisusePrimary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGeneral PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle Agedcrowdingdaytime GPC The Hagueemergency departmentprimary careself-referrals

Identifiers

PMID31175200
PMCPMC6588995
OpenAlexW2953649249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.