Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175184›Full record

ReviewMolecular pharmacology2019

A Biased View of

Alexandra E Conibear, Eamonn Kelly

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of β-Arrestin 2 in the antinociceptive and side effect profile of morphine and the novel mu opioid receptor agonists, kurkinorin and kurkinol.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dezocine and Addiction: Friend or Foe?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Design, Synthesis, andACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexandra E ConibearSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom Alex.conibear@bristol.ac.uk.
Eamonn KellySchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N020669/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of biased agonism has grown substantially in recent years and the

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansProtein BindingReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID31175184
PMCPMC6784500
OpenAlexW2959913173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.