Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31175148›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Contribution of FEF to Attentional Periodicity during Visual Search: A TMS Study.

Laura Dugué, Alexy-Assaf Beck, Philippe Marque, Rufin VanRullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Attention Rhythmically Shapes Sensory Tuning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to frontal but not occipital cortex disrupts endogenous attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Rhythms in cognition: The evidence revisited.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura DuguéCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Unité Mixte de Recherche 8002, 75006 Paris, France Laura.dugue@parisdescartes.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-3085-1458
Alexy-Assaf BeckPsychological Sciences Research Institute and Institute of Neuroscience, Université de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique.
Philippe MarqueMédecine Physique et de Réadaption, 31059 Toulouse, France.
Rufin VanRullenCNRS, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5549, Faculté de Médecine de Purpan, 31052 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3611-7716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search, looking for a target embedded among distractors, has long been used to study attention. Current theories postulate a two-stage process in which early visual areas perform feature extraction, whereas higher-order regions perform attentional selection. Such a model implies iterative communication between low- and high-level regions to sequentially select candidate targets in the array, focus attention on these elements, and eventually permit target recognition. This leads to two independent predictions: (1) high-level, attentional regions and (2) early visual regions should both be involved periodically during the search. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the frontal eye field (FEF) in humans, known to be involved in attentional selection, at various delays while observers performed a difficult, attentional search task. We observed a periodic pattern of interference at ∼6 Hz (theta) suggesting that the FEF is periodically involved during this difficult search task. We further compared this result with two previous studies (Dugué et al., 2011, 2015a) in which a similar TMS procedure was applied over the early visual cortex (V1) while observers performed the same task. This analysis revealed the same pattern of interference, i.e., V1 is periodically involved during this difficult search task, at the theta frequency. Past V1 evidence reappraised for this paper, together with our current FEF results, confirm both of our independent predictions, and suggest that difficult search is supported by low- and high-level regions, each involved periodically at the theta frequency.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleTime FactorsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung AdultFEFperiodicitythetaTMSV1visual search

Identifiers

PMID31175148
PMCPMC6591533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.