Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31174676›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2019

The Cone Photoreceptor Mosaic in Aniridia: Within-Family Phenotype-Genotype Discordance.

Hilde R Pedersen, Maureen Neitz, Stuart J Gilson, Erlend C S Landsend, Øygunn Aas Utheim, Tor Paaske Utheim, Rigmor C Baraas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Age-Related Macular Degeneration, a Mathematically Tractable Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Long-term retinal imaging of a case of suspected congenital rubella infection.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hilde R PedersenNational Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Maureen NeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Stuart J GilsonNational Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Erlend C S LandsendDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Øygunn Aas UtheimThe Norwegian Dry Eye Clinic, Oslo, Norway.
Tor Paaske UtheimNational Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway; Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Rigmor C BaraasNational Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway. Electronic address: rigmor.baraas@usn.no.
University of South-Eastern Norway · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInvestigate in vivo cone photoreceptor structure in familial aniridia caused by deletion in the PAX6 gene to elucidate the complexity of between-individual variation in retinal phenotype.

designDescriptive case-control study.

participantsEight persons with congenital aniridia (40-66 yrs) from 1 family and 33 normal control participants (14-69 yrs), including 7 unaffected family members (14-53 yrs).

methodsDNA was isolated from saliva samples and used in polymerase chain reaction analysis to amplify and sequence exons and intron or exon junctions of the PAX6 gene. High-resolution retinal images were acquired with OCT and adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy. Cone density (CD; in cones per square millimeter) and mosaic regularity were estimated along nasal-temporal meridians within the central 0° to 5° eccentricity. Horizontal spectral-domain OCT line scans were segmented to analyze the severity of foveal hypoplasia (FH) and to measure retinal layer thicknesses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Within-family variability in macular retinal layer thicknesses, cone photoreceptor density, and mosaic regularity in aniridia compared with normal control participants.

resultsDNA sequencing revealed a known PAX6 mutation (IV2-2delA). Those with aniridia showed variable iris phenotype ranging from almost normal appearance to no iris. Four participants with aniridia demonstrated FH grade 2, 2 demonstrated grade 3 FH, and 1 demonstrated grade 4 FH. Visual acuity ranged from 0.20 to 0.86 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy images were acquired from 5 family members with aniridia. Foveal CD varied between 19 899 and 55 128 cones/mm

conclusionsThe results showed considerable variability in foveal development within a family carrying the same PAX6 mutation. This, together with the structural and functional variability within each grade of foveal hypoplasia, underlines the importance of advancing knowledge about retinal cellular phenotype in aniridia.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultAgedAniridiaCase-Control StudiesCell CountDNADNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmoscopyDNAPAX6 protein, humanPAX6 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID31174676
PMCPMC6557282
OpenAlexW2913360357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.