Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31174612›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2019

A framework for assessing local transmission risk of imported malaria cases.

Lei Lei, Jack S Richards, Zhi-Hong Li, Yan-Feng Gong, Shao-Zai Zhang, Ning Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Transmission Dynamics, Heterogeneity and Controllability of SARS-CoV-2: A Rural-Urban Comparison.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Lei LeiJiangxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China.
Jack S RichardsThe Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.
Zhi-Hong LiJiangxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China.
Yan-Feng GongJiangxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China.
Shao-Zai ZhangJiangxi Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanchang, China.
Ning XiaoNational Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research; WHO Collaborating Centre for Tropical Diseases; National Center for International Research on Tropical Diseases, Ministry of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Parasite and Vector Biology, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China. ningxiao116@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5754-5819
Nanchang Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNBurnet Institute · AUNational Institute for Parasitic Diseases · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2016YFC1200500Science and Technology Plan of Health and Family Planning Commission of Jiangxi Province No. 20172002the Fourth Round of Three-Year Public Health Action Plan of Shanghai, China No. 15GWZK0101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key issue in achieving and sustaining malaria elimination is the need to prevent local transmission arising from imported cases of malaria. The likelihood of this occurring depends on a range of local factors, and these can be used to allocate resources to contain transmission. Therefore, a risk assessment and management strategy is required to identify risk indexes for malaria transmission when imported cases occur. These risks also need to be quantified and combined to give a weighted risk index score. This can then be used to allocate the resources to each administrative region to prevent transmission according to the degree of risk.

methodsA list of potential risk indexes were generated from a literature review, expert consultation and panel discussion. These were initially classified into 4 first-level indexes including infection source, transmitting conditions, population vulnerability and control capacity. Each of these was then expanded into more detailed second-level indexes. The Delphi method was then used to obtain expert opinion to review and revise these risk indexes over two consecutive rounds to quantify agreement among experts as to their level of importance. Risk indexes were included in the final Transmission Risk Framework if they achieved a weighted importance score ≥ 4. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was then used to calculate the weight allocated to each of the final risk indexes. This was then used to create an assessment framework that can be used to evaluate local transmission risk in different areas.

resultsTwo rounds of Delphi consultation were conducted. Twenty-three experts were used at each round with 100% recovery rate of participant questionnaires. The coordination coefficients (W) for the two rounds of Delphi consultation were 0.341 and 0.423, respectively (P < 0.05). Three first-level indexes and 13 second-level indexes were identified. The Analytic Hierarchy Process was performed to calculate the weight of the indexes. For the first-level indexes, infection source, transmitting conditions, and control capacity, the index weight was 0.5396, 0.2970 and 0.1634 respectively. For the three top second-level indexes, number of imported malaria cases, Anopheles species, and awareness of timely medical visit of patient, the index weight was 0.3382, 0.2475, and 0.1509 respectively.

conclusionsAn indexed system of transmission risk assessment for imported malaria was established using the Delphi method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. This was assessed to be an objective and practical tool for assessing transmission risk from imported cases of malaria into China.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnimalsAnophelesChinaCommunicable Diseases, ImportedDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMalariaMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalytic hierarchy processDelphi methodImported malariaTransmission risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID31174612
PMCPMC6555958
OpenAlexW2955838781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.