Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31174524›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Distance learning in antimicrobial stewardship: innovation in medical education.

Michel Laks, Carla Morales Guerra, João Luiz Miraglia, Eduardo Alexandrino Medeiros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Changing Climate, ChangingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michel LaksInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros, 690, second floor, São Paulo, Brazil. ohlakse@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-1011
Carla Morales GuerraInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros, 690, second floor, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Luiz MiragliaInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros, 690, second floor, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Alexandrino MedeirosInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Napoleão de Barros, 690, second floor, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to analyse the impact that web-based distance learning has on knowledge gain in medical students, as well as student perceptions of the methodology.

methodsThis was an educational intervention study conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. From 2008 to 2014, we offered a free web-based distance learning course, covering antimicrobial use and microbial resistance, to fifth-year medical students. The course encompassed 100 h of activities, with five theoretical modules, exercises and simulations, within a virtual learning environment. The students were tutored in their online activities, and some classes were conducted in real time for live discussions. In addition, students underwent face-to-face assessments of their knowledge of the topic before and after the course. Statistical analysis was performed and the means of the overall scores were obtained, as were the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The means were compared by two-tailed paired t-tests and by the paired Wilcoxon test.

resultsOf 814 eligible medical students, 606 (74.45%) completed the entire course during the study period. The mean score for knowledge of the topic was significantly higher on the final assessment than on the initial assessment (p <  0.001). We found that dedication (in hours) was directly proportional to the level of participation, as reflected in the mean final score (p = 0.009) and in the proportion of students who passed (p = 0.028). All of the participants considered their knowledge adequate or insufficient before the course, stating that it is quite important or important to address the topic during medical education. Although dedication levels were low, 70.5% stated that they had learned "quite a lot" or "more than expected" about the topic and would dedicate more time to it if they could.

conclusionsThe use of a virtual learning environment can promote teaching and learning in the infectious diseases field, specifically for antimicrobial stewardship, increasing knowledge significantly, and should be considered for inclusion in the final stages of medical education.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipBrazilDrug Resistance, MicrobialEducational MeasurementEducation, DistanceHumansOrganizational InnovationStudents, MedicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial stewardshipDistance educationMedicine education

Identifiers

PMID31174524
PMCPMC6555969
OpenAlexW2948256160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.