Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31174412›Full record

ArticleGenes2019

Single Fragment or Bulk Soil DNA Metabarcoding: Which is Better for Characterizing Biological Taxa Found in Surface Soils for Sample Separation?

Laura M Boggs, Melissa K R Scheible, Gustavo Machado, Kelly A Meiklejohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding Protocols for Species Identification.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura M BoggsDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. lboggs@ncsu.edu.
Melissa K R ScheibleDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. mkscheib@ncsu.edu.
Gustavo MachadoDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. gmachad@ncsu.edu.
Kelly A MeiklejohnDepartment of Population Health and Pathobiology, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. kameikle@ncsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In forensic geology casework, sample size typically limits routine characterization of material using bulk approaches. To address this, DNA-based characterization of biological taxa has received attention, as the taxa present can be useful for sample-to-sample comparisons and source attribution. In our initial work, low biodiversity was captured when DNA barcodes were Sanger-sequenced from plant and insect fragments isolated from 10 forensic-type surface soils. Considering some forensic laboratories now have access to massively parallel sequencing platforms, we assessed whether biological taxa present in the same surface soils could be better characterized using DNA metabarcoding. To achieve this, plant and animal barcodes were amplified and sequenced on an Illumina MiniSeq for three different DNA sample types (

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInsectaMetagenomePlantsSoilSoilanimalsDNA barcodingDNA metabarcodingforensic-type soilsplants

Identifiers

PMID31174412
PMCPMC6627524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.