ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2019
Cesarean section after laparoscopic hysterosacropexy with Richardson's lateral repair and Burch operation-Case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of childbirth on pelvic floor dysfunction in women who have undergone previous pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2024Pooled it
- Pregnancy After Uterine-Preserving Prolapse Surgery: Obstetric Outcomes and Prolapse Recurrence Following Native Tissue and Mesh-Augmented Repairs.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Pregnancy After Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy: Is it A Safe Option for Fertility Spearing?Journal of family & reproductive health · 2023Article
- Successful Pregnancy Outcome After Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Cureus · 2021Article
- Effect of pregnancy on uterine-sparing pelvic organ prolapse repair.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPelvic floor disorders are common also in young patient population. Their quality of life is lessened because of their condition, but they would also like to avoid any complicated operations. The minimal invasive procedures and fertility sparing are very important. CASE PRESENTATION: 32 year old caucasian female (BMI: 22,6) was admitted to our clinic in August 2016 with the following symptoms: the feeling of a foreign body in the vagina, prolapse of the bladder and stage II stress urinary incontinence. She had 2 vaginal deliveries. A gynecological examination of the pelvic organ prolapse was classified as follows: prolapse of the uterus POP-Q II, and a cystocele with a lateral defect POP-Q III, after reposition of uterus cystocele POP-Q II, urethrocele, positive cough test. She underwent a laparoscopic hysteropexy with lateral repair and Burch operation. Effect of the operation was satisfied. It revealed an improvement in the QoL-Questionnaire PIFQ-7. Pregnancy in 2018 was delivered by cesarean section. The effect of the prolapse operation was not affected and the quality of life maintained.
conclusionLaparoscopic hysteropexy should be a standard procedure for the repair of a level I defect in young patients, particularly as a fertility sparing procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.