Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31173859›Full record

ReviewBrain research bulletin2019

Challenges of gene delivery to the central nervous system and the growing use of biomaterial vectors.

Devan L Puhl, Anthony R D'Amato, Ryan J Gilbert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Devan L PuhlDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, Troy, New York, 12180, United States; Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1623 15th Street, Troy, New York, 12180, United States. Electronic address: puhld@rpi.edu.
Anthony R D'AmatoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, Troy, New York, 12180, United States; Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1623 15th Street, Troy, New York, 12180, United States. Electronic address: ant.damato22@gmail.com.
Ryan J GilbertDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th Street, Troy, New York, 12180, United States; Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1623 15th Street, Troy, New York, 12180, United States. Electronic address: gilber2@rpi.edu.

Funding

Enhanced Neuroprotection Following Acute SCI Using Fibrous MaterialsR01NS092754 · NINDS · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI GILBERT, RYAN J. · 2015 to 2019
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy is a promising form of treatment for those suffering from neurological disorders or central nervous system (CNS) injury, however, obstacles remain that limit its translational potential. The CNS is protected by the blood brain barrier, and this barrier blocks genes from traversing into the CNS if administered outside of the CNS. Viral and non-viral gene delivery vehicles, commonly referred to as vectors, are modified to enhance delivery efficiency to target locations in the CNS. Still, there are few gene therapy approaches approved by the FDA for CNS disease or injury treatment. The lack of viable clinical approaches is due, in part, to the unpredictable nature of many vector systems. In particular, safety concerns exist with the use of viral vectors for CNS gene delivery. To seek some alternatives to viral vectors, development of new non-viral, biomaterial vectors is occurring at a rapid rate. This review discusses the challenges of delivering various forms of genetic material to the CNS, the use and limitations of current viral vector delivery systems, and the use of non-viral, biomaterial vectors for CNS applications.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer TechniquesAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCentral Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System DiseasesGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansBiocompatible MaterialsBiomaterialsCentral nervous systemGene deliveryNon-viral vectors

Identifiers

PMID31173859
PMCPMC8284997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.