Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31173600›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Maize responsiveness to Azospirillum brasilense: Insights into genetic control, heterosis and genomic prediction.

Miriam Suzane Vidotti, Filipe Inácio Matias, Filipe Couto Alves, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, Gregório Alvarado Beltran, Juan Burgueño, José Crossa, Roberto Fritsche-Neto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Corn Responsiveness toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miriam Suzane VidottiGenetics Department, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-9415
Filipe Inácio MatiasGenetics Department, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Filipe Couto AlvesDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezStatistic Department, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico.
Gregório Alvarado BeltranBiometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado de Mexico, Mexico.
Juan BurgueñoBiometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado de Mexico, Mexico.
José CrossaBiometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado de Mexico, Mexico.
Roberto Fritsche-NetoGenetics Department, "Luiz de Queiroz" College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have shown differences in the abilities of maize genotypes to facilitate or impede Azospirillum brasilense colonization and to receive benefits from this association. Hence, our aim was to study the genetic control, heterosis effect and the prediction accuracy of the shoot and root traits of maize in response to A. brasilense. For that, we evaluated 118 hybrids under two contrasting scenarios: i) N stress (control) and ii) N stress plus A. brasilense inoculation. The diallel analyses were performed using mixed model equations, and the genomic prediction models accounted for the general and specific combining ability (GCA and SCA, respectively) and the presence or not of G×E effects. In addition, the genomic models were fitted considering parametric (G-BLUP) and semi-parametric (RKHS) kernels. The genotypes showed significant inoculation effect for five root traits, and the GCA and SCA were significant for both. The GCA in the inoculated treatment presented a greater magnitude than the control, whereas the opposite was observed for SCA. Heterosis was weakly influenced by the inoculation, and the heterozygosity and N status in the plant can have a role in the benefits that can be obtained from this Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria (PGPB). Prediction accuracies for N stress plus A. brasilense ranged from 0.42 to 0.78, depending on the scenario and trait, and were higher, in most cases, than the non-inoculated treatment. Finally, our findings provide an understanding of the quantitative variation of maize responsiveness to A. brasilense and important insights to be applied in maize breeding aiming the development of superior hybrids for this association.

Indexed as

Azospirillum brasilenseGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, PlantGenomicsHeterozygoteHybridization, GeneticHybrid VigorInbreedingPhenotypePlant RootsQuantitative Trait, HeritableStress, PhysiologicalZea mays

Identifiers

PMID31173600
PMCPMC6555527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.