Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31173528›Full record

ArticleArchives of pathology & laboratory medicine2019

Implementation of Digital Pathology Offers Clinical and Operational Increase in Efficiency and Cost Savings.

Matthew G Hanna, Victor E Reuter, Jennifer Samboy, Christine England, Lorraine Corsale, Samson W Fine, Narasimhan P Agaram, Evangelos Stamelos, Yukako Yagi, Meera Hameed and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Digital Pathology in Hematopathology: From Vision to Deployment.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Digital neuropathology of neurodegenerative disorders: Foundations, research advances, and future directions.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthew G HannaFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Victor E ReuterFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jennifer SamboyFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christine EnglandFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lorraine CorsaleFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Samson W FineFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Narasimhan P AgaramFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Evangelos StamelosFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Yukako YagiFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Meera HameedFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David S KlimstraFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
S Joseph SirintrapunFrom the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Digital pathology (DP) implementations vary in scale, based on aims of intended operation. Few laboratories have completed a full-scale DP implementation, which may be due to high overhead costs that disrupt the traditional pathology workflow. Neither standardized criteria nor benchmark data have yet been published showing practical return on investment after implementing a DP platform. OBJECTIVE.—: To provide benchmark data and practical metrics to support operational efficiency and cost savings in a large academic center. DESIGN.—: Metrics reviewed include archived pathology asset retrieval; ancillary test request for recurrent/metastatic disease; cost analysis and turnaround time (TAT); and DP experience survey. RESULTS.—: Glass slide requests from the department slide archive and an off-site surgery center showed a 93% and 97% decrease, respectively. Ancillary immunohistochemical orders, compared in 2014 (52%)-before whole slide images (WSIs) were available in the laboratory information system-and 2017 (21%) showed $114 000/y in anticipated savings. Comprehensive comparative cost analysis showed a 5-year $1.3 million savings. Surgical resection cases with prior WSIs showed a 1-day decrease in TAT. A DP experience survey showed 80% of respondents agreed WSIs improved their clinical sign-out experience. CONCLUSIONS.—: Implementing a DP operation showed a noteworthy increase in efficiency and operational utility. Digital pathology deployments and operations may be gauged by the following metrics: number of glass slide requests as WSIs become available, decrease in confirmatory testing for patients with metastatic/recurrent disease, long-term decrease in off-site pathology asset costs, and faster TAT. Other departments may use our benchmark data and metrics to enhance patient care and demonstrate return on investment to justify adoption of DP.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingEfficiencyHumansPathology, ClinicalWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID31173528
PMCPMC7448534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.