Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31173250›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019

Screening key genes and signaling pathways in colorectal cancer by integrated bioinformatics analysis.

Chang Yu, Fuqiang Chen, Jianjun Jiang, Hong Zhang, Meijuan Zhou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Value analysis ofTranslational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identification of Novel Prognostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer by Bioinformatics Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chang YuDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, P.R. China.
Fuqiang ChenDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, P.R. China.
Jianjun JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, P.R. China.
Hong ZhangThe First Affiliated Hospital, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, P.R. China.
Meijuan ZhouDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, P.R. China.
Southern Medical University · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify potential key genes associated with the progression and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CRC and normal samples were screened by integrated analysis of gene expression profile datasets, including the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was conducted to identify the biological role of DEGs. In addition, a protein‑protein interaction network and survival analysis were used to identify the key genes. The profiles of GSE9348, GSE22598 and GSE113513 were downloaded from the GEO database. A total of 405 common DEGs were identified, including 236 down‑ and 169 upregulated. GO analysis revealed that the downregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in 'detoxification of copper ion' [biological process, (BP)], 'oxidoreductase activity, acting on CH‑OH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor' [molecular function, (MF)] and 'brush border' [cellular component, (CC)]. Upregulated DEGs were mainly involved in 'nuclear division' (BP), 'snoRNA binding' (MF) and 'nucleolar part' (CC). KEGG pathway analysis revealed that DEGs were mainly involved in 'mineral absorption', 'nitrogen metabolism', 'cell cycle' and 'caffeine metabolism'. A PPI network was constructed with 268 nodes and 1,027 edges. The top one module was selected, and it was revealed that module‑related genes were mainly enriched in the GO terms 'sister chromatid segregation' (BP), 'chemokine activity' (MF), and 'condensed chromosome (CC)'. The KEGG pathway was mainly enriched in 'cell cycle', 'progesterone‑mediated oocyte maturation', 'chemokine signaling pathway', 'IL‑17 signaling pathway', 'legionellosis', and 'rheumatoid arthritis'. DNA topoisomerase II‑α (TOP2A), mitotic arrest deficient 2 like 1 (MAD2L1), cyclin B1 (CCNB1), checkpoint kinase 1 (CHEK1), cell division cycle 6 (CDC6) and ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 C (UBE2C) were indicated as hub genes. Furthermore, survival analysis revealed that TOP2A, MAD2L1, CDC6 and CHEK1 may serve as prognostic biomarkers in CRC. The present study provided insights into the molecular mechanism of CRC that may be useful in further investigations.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerGenes, NeoplasmSignal TransductionColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDown-RegulationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene OntologyHumansProtein Interaction MapsSurvival AnalysisUp-Regulation

Identifiers

PMID31173250
PMCPMC6625394
OpenAlexW2948573781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.