Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31173084›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2019

Identification of resilient sows in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-infected farms

Glòria Abella, Elena Novell, Vicenç Tarancon, Luis Varona, Ramona N Pena, Joan Estany, Lorenzo Fraile

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A genome-wide screen for resilient responses in growing pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Resilience Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Glòria AbellaDepartament de Ciència Animal, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Lleida, Spain.
Elena NovellDepartament de Ciència Animal, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Lleida, Spain.
Vicenç TaranconGrup de Saneajament Porcí, Lleida, Spain.
Luis VaronaInstituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2). Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ramona N PenaDepartament de Ciència Animal, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Lleida, Spain.
Joan EstanyDepartament de Ciència Animal, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Lleida, Spain.
Lorenzo FraileDepartament de Ciència Animal, University of Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Lleida, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of resilient sows can improve reproductive performance in farms exposed to multiple challenges. A common challenge is the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). A key issue to deal with disease resilience is to set up a feasible phenotyping strategy. Our aim was to develop a phenotyping criterion to discriminate susceptible from resilient sows in PRRSV-infected farms. A total of 517 Landrace x Large White gilts were classified as resilient (R) or susceptible (S) to PRRSV virus, following vaccination with MLV-PRRSV at 6 to 7 wk of age, in a PRRSV negative multiplication farm. Female piglets were phenotyped as R if their serum was negative to PRRSV at 7 and 21 d postvaccination (DPV) or as S if their serum was positive at 7 and/or 21 DPV. Amongst them, 382 gilts were transferred to a PRRSV-positive production farm, where the number of piglets born alive (NBA), stillborn (NSB), mummified (NMU), lost (NLP = NSB + NMU), and total born (NTB = NBA + NLP) were recorded for almost 3 yr. Data were collected during 2 periods according to the PRRSV farm health status, which were confirmed as either PRRSV-positive stable (endemic) or inestable (epidemic). Analyses were carried out under a Bayesian approach. The heritability for the resilience criterion was estimated using a threshold model. A linear (for NTB and NBA) and a binomial model (for NSB, NMU, and NLP) on the resilience criterion by the farm health status were used to assess the difference between R and S sows. The heritability of the resilience criterion was 0.46 (SD 0.06). The probability of a piglet being lost was greater (≥0.97) in S than in R litters, regardless of whether the delivery occurred during a PRRSV outbreak (20.5% vs. 17.0%) or not (15.8% vs. 13.7%). The lower piglet mortality rate in R sows was due to NSB, in the endemic phase (13.0% vs. 15.0% of NTB, with a posterior probability of 98% of S sows showing higher NSB than R sows), and to NMU, in the epidemic phase (4.0% vs. 8.4% of NTB, with a posterior probability of >99% of S sows showing higher NMU than R sows). During a PRRSV outbreak, the S sows were twice as likely to give birth to a mummified piglet when compared with R sows. These findings provide evidence that the described phenotyping scheme has a potential use as a PRRSV resilience criterion.

Indexed as

phenotyping methodPRRSVresiliencesow

Identifiers

PMID31173084
PMCPMC6667243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.