Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172960›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Patients' Perceptions of Portal Use Across Care Settings: Qualitative Study.

Ann Scheck McAlearney, Cynthia J Sieck, Alice Gaughan, Naleef Fareed, Jaclyn Volney, Timothy R Huerta

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Physicians' Perspectives on Inpatient Portals: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Helping Patients Be Better Patients: A Qualitative Study of Perceptions About Inpatient Portal Use.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann Scheck McAlearneyDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9107-5419
Cynthia J SieckDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6517-885X
Alice GaughanCATALYST (Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9109-3473
Naleef FareedCATALYST (Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8764-1625
Jaclyn VolneyCATALYST (Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking), College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1080-1912
Timothy R HuertaDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-3564

Funding

The Institute for the Design of Environments Aligned for Patient Safety (IDEA4PS)P30HS024379 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2015
$4.0M
High Tech and High Touch (HT2): Transforming patient engagement through portal technology at the bedsideR01HS024091 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2018
$967k
Development and Evaluation of Socio-Technical Metrics to Inform HIT AdaptationR21HS024767 · AHRQ · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YEN, PO-YIN · 2016 to 2017
$291k
AHRQ HHS P30 HS024379AHRQ HHS R01 HS024091AHRQ HHS R21 HS024767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient portals are a promising instrument to improve patient-centered care, as they provide patients information and tools that can help them better manage their health. The implementation of portals in both the inpatient and outpatient setting gives health care providers an opportunity to support patients both during hospitalization and after discharge. Thus, there is a need to better understand how inpatient and outpatient portals are used across care contexts.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine patients' perceptions of using inpatient and outpatient portals across the care settings, including how they used the portals and the benefits and concerns associated with portal use.

methodsThis study was conducted in a large Midwestern academic medical center consisting of seven hospitals. We interviewed 120 patients who had used an inpatient portal during their hospitalization, at 15 days and 6 months postdischarge, to determine their perspectives of portal use in both hospital and outpatient settings. Interview transcripts were analyzed inductively and deductively by using team coding processes consistent with a grounded theory approach.

resultsInterviews focused on three main areas of portal use: experience with the portal features, perceived benefits, and concerns. Responses at 15 days (n=60) and 6 months (n=60) postdischarge were consistent with respect to perceptions about portal use. Patients identified viewing their health information, managing their schedule, and communicating with providers as notable activities. Convenience, access to information, and better engagement in care were indicated as benefits. Concerns were related to technology issues and privacy/security risks.

conclusionsImplementation of inpatient portals as a complement to outpatient portals is increasing and can enable patients to better manage aspects of their care. Although care processes vary substantively across settings, the benefits of convenience, improved access to information, and better engagement in care provide opportunities for portal use across care settings to support patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInpatientsOutpatientsPatient-Centered CareFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOhioPatient Portalsambulatory careengagementhospitalizationimplementationmedical informaticspatient portals

Identifiers

PMID31172960
PMCPMC6592494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.