Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172912›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical microbiology2019

Detection and quantification of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae in blood from infected chickens - addressing challenges with detection of DNA from infectious agents in host species with nucleated red blood cells.

Eva Wattrang, Victoria Jäderblom, Tomas Jinnerot, Helena Eriksson, Elisabeth Bagge, Maria Persson, Tina Sørensen Dalgaard, Robert Söderlund

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva WattrangDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden.
Victoria JäderblomDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden.
Tomas JinnerotDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden.
Helena ErikssonDepartment of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, SE-75189 National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elisabeth BaggeDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria PerssonDepartment of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, SE-75189 National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tina Sørensen DalgaardDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark.
Robert SöderlundDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, SE-75189 Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish Veterinary Agency · SEAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study aimed to establish pretreatment protocols as well as real-time and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodologies to detect and quantify Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae (ER) DNA in blood samples from infected chickens, as tools for routine diagnostics and monitoring of experimental infections. Chicken blood is a problematic matrix for PCR analysis because nucleated erythrocytes contribute large amounts of host DNA that inhibit amplification. METHODOLOGY: Using artificially spiked samples of fresh chicken blood, as well as blood samples from three experimental infection studies, the performance of pretreatment protocols, including choice of blood stabilization agent, centrifugation speeds and Ficoll gradient separation, was evaluated. The results were compared with those from traditional culture-based protocols combined with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).Results/Key findings. Simple preparations producing cell-free samples performed well on artificial spike-in samples, providing high sensitivity. However, performance was poor in clinical samples or artificial samples where the bacteria were incubated for 4 h or more in fresh blood prior to DNA extraction. In these samples, a Ficoll separation protocol that creates samples rich in lymphocytes, monocytes and thrombocytes prior to DNA extraction was far more effective.

conclusionsOur results indicate that ER bacteria undergo rapid phagocytosis in chicken blood and that analysis of a blood fraction enriched for phagocytic cells is necessary for reliable detection and quantification. The presented results explain the poor performance of PCR detection reported in previously published experimental ER infection studies, and the proposed solutions are likely to have broader implications for PCR-based veterinary diagnostics in non-mammalian host species such as poultry and fish.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensDNA, BacterialErysipelothrixErysipelothrix InfectionsErythrocytesPolymerase Chain ReactionPoultry DiseasesDNA, Bacterialbloodchickendroplet digital PCRErysipelothrix rhusiopathiaenucleated erythrocytereal-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

Identifiers

PMID31172912
PMCPMC6939158
OpenAlexW2951007773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.