Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172544›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2020

Association of PROtein and CAloric Intake and Clinical Outcomes in Adult SEPTic and Non-Septic ICU Patients on Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: The PROCASEPT Retrospective Study.

Marie-Sophie Louise Yvonne de Koning, Wilhelmina Aria Christina Kristine Koekkoek, Johannes Cornelis Nicolaas Hans Kars, Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of permissive hypocaloricWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nutrition Support in the ICU-A Refresher in the Era of COVID-19.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie-Sophie Louise Yvonne de KoningDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmina Aria Christina Kristine KoekkoekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands.
Johannes Cornelis Nicolaas Hans KarsDepartment of Information Technology and Datawarehouse, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands.
Arthur Raymond Hubert van ZantenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6276-7192
Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal nutritional support for critically ill septic patients remains unknown. This study evaluates the associations of macronutrient intake during the first week of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and long-term clinical outcomes in septic and non-septic patients.

methodsProlonged mechanically ventilated patients were retrospectively studied. The association of protein (low: <0.8 g/kg/d, medium: 0.8-1.2 g/kg/d, high >1.2 g/kg/d) and energy intake (<80%, 80%-110%, 110% of target) during days 1-3 and 4-7 after ICU admission and 6-month mortality was analyzed for septic and non-septic patients separately.

resultsA total of 423 patients were investigated. Of these, 297 had sepsis. In the sepsis group, medium protein intake at days 4-7 was associated with lower 6-month mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.646, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.418-0.996, P=0.048) compared with high intake. In the non-sepsis group, early high and late low protein intake were associated with higher 6-month mortality (HR: 3.902, 95% CI: 1.505-10.115, P=0.005; HR: 2.642, 95% CI: 1.128-6.189, P=0.025) compared with low and high protein intake, respectively. For energy intake, late energy intake of >110% was associated with decreased mortality in septic patients (HR: 0.400, 95% CI: 0.222-0.721, P=0.002), whereas in non-septic patients, late medium energy intake (80%-110%) was associated with better survival (HR: 0.379, 95% CI: 0.175-0.820, P=0.014), both compared with low energy intake.

conclusionDivergent associations of macronutrient intake were found; early high protein intake in non-septic patients, but not in septic patients, was found to be associated with higher 6-month mortality.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsEnergy IntakeRespiration, ArtificialAdultCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesDietary Proteinsautophagycritical care nutritionenergymortalityproteinsepsis

Identifiers

PMID31172544
PMCPMC7078979
OpenAlexW2948938064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.