ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2019
Rationale, Design for the ASSET Study: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Empagliflozin's Effect to Sitagliptin on Cardiac Fat Accumulation/Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prospective randomized study comparing effects of empagliflozin to sitagliptin on cardiac fat accumulation, cardiac function, and cardiac metabolism in patients with early-stage type 2 diabetes: the ASSET study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Trial
- Review
- Advances and challenges of targeting epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT).Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEctopic fat accumulation has been found to play a pathophysiological role in insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and coronary artery diseases. Findings from a number of previous studies suggest that sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce lipid accumulation, including myocardial and pericardial fat, while dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors suppress ectopic lipid accumulation and improve cardiac function. However, a clinical study that precisely explains and compares the efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP4 inhibitors on cardiac fat accumulation has not been performed. Moreover, the association between cardiac fat accumulation and cardiac function or metabolic changes, such as tissue-specific insulin resistance, remains unclear. It is our intention to conduct the first study to assess the effects of empagliflozin compared to sitagliptin in reducing ectopic fat accumulation, specifically pericardial fat, and its association with improvement in cardiac function and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity.
methodsWe have designed a prospective, randomized open-label, and blinded-endpoint study with the intention to enroll 44 Japanese patients with T2DM. The patients are to be divided them into two groups, an empagliflozin group and an sitagliptin group, with the former to be supplemented with empagliflozin 10 mg and the latter to be supplemented with sitagliptin 100 mg, both groups for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study is the change in the amount of pericardial fat. The secondary endpoints are the changes in the amount of intracellular fat in the myocardium, cardiac function, tissue-specific insulin sensitivity, fatty acid metabolism in myocardial tissue, assessed by parameters of iodine-123-β-methyl-iodophenyl pentadecanoic acid myocardial scintigraphy, blood and urine biomarkers, and lifestyle evaluation. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The results of this study will be available in 2020. The aim of this study is to provide an effective treatment strategy for patients with T2DM by considering cardiac fat accumulation, cardiac function, and insulin resistance.
fundingBoehringer Ingelheim & Eli Lilly and Company Diabetes Alliance.
trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000026340.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.