Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172446›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2019

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of GDC-0276, a Novel Na

Michael E Rothenberg, Michael Tagen, Jae H Chang, Janel Boyce-Rustay, Michel Friesenhahn, David H Hackos, Avis Hains, Dan Sutherlin, Michael Ward, William Cho

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting NaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Role of NaThe Journal of physiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Inhibition of NaRSC medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Antitussive effects of NaEuropean journal of pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  20. Discovery of Arylsulfonamide NaACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael E RothenbergGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. rothenberg.michael@gene.com.
Michael TagenGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Jae H ChangGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Janel Boyce-RustayGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Michel FriesenhahnGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
David H HackosGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Avis HainsGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Dan SutherlinGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Michael WardGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
William ChoGenentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Gene Therapy Laboratory · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveCurrent pain therapies often do not provide adequate pain relief and have dose-limiting adverse effects. Genetic evidence indicates that Na

methodsThis phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed GDC-0276 as powder-in-capsule (PIC) or cyclodextrin solution (CD) single doses (SDs) of 2-270 mg (seven cohorts) and 45-540 mg (five cohorts), respectively. Multiple (MD) PIC doses were administered as total daily doses of 15-540 mg divided into two or three doses/day, up to 10 or 14 days. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), vital signs, physical examinations, electrocardiograms, and laboratory tests for up to 15 days after the last day of dosing. GDC-0276 plasma pharmacokinetics were also determined.

resultsThree stages included 183 randomized subjects. GDC-0276 plasma exposure increased with dose level for all stages. Exposure was higher in the SD-CD cohorts compared with the equivalent SD-PIC dose levels. SDs were adequately tolerated up to 270 mg (SD-PIC) and 360 mg (SD-CD). Hypotension limited tolerability in the 540-mg SD-CD cohort. Multiple PIC doses were tolerated up to 270 mg twice daily, however liver transaminase elevations were frequently observed. No deaths or serious AEs occurred.

conclusionGDC-0276 exhibited a safety and pharmacokinetic profile that supports its future investigation as a potential therapeutic for pain.

Indexed as

AzetidinesBenzamidesSodium Channel BlockersAdolescentAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedNAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPainPlacebosAzetidinesBenzamidesGDC-0276NAV1.7 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPlacebosSCN9A protein, humanSodium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID31172446
OpenAlexW2957640498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.