Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172439›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2019

Analysis and optimization of the robot setup for robotic-ultrasound-guided radiation therapy.

Matthias Schlüter, Stefan Gerlach, Christoph Fürweger, Alexander Schlaefer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-based optimization for US-guided radiation therapy of the prostate.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  2. Systematic analysis of volumetric ultrasound parameters for markerless 4D motion tracking.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias SchlüterInstitute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany. matthias.schlueter@tuhh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-1102
Stefan GerlachInstitute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph FürwegerEuropäisches Cyberknife Zentrum München-Großhadern, Munich, Germany.
Alexander SchlaeferInstitute of Medical Technology, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHL 1844/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRobotic ultrasound promises continuous, volumetric, and non-ionizing tracking of organ motion during radiation therapy. However, placement of the robot is critical because it is radio-opaque and might severely influence the achievable dose distribution.

methodsWe propose two heuristic optimization strategies for automatic placement of an ultrasound robot around a patient. Considering a kinematically redundant robot arm, we compare a generic approach based on stochastic search and a more problem-specific segmentwise construction approach. The former allows for multiple elbow configurations while the latter is deterministic. Additionally, we study different objective functions guiding the search. Our evaluation is based on data for ten actual prostate cancer cases and we compare the resulting plan quality for both methods to manually chosen robot configurations previously proposed.

resultsThe mean improvements in the treatment planning objective value with respect to the best manually selected robot position and a single elbow configuration range from 8.2 to 32.8% and 8.5 to 15.5% for segmentwise construction and stochastic search, respectively. Considering three different elbow configurations, the stochastic search results in better objective values in 80% of the cases, with 30% being significantly better. The optimization strategies are robust with respect to beam sampling and transducer orientation and using previous optimization results as starting point for stochastic search typically results in better solutions compared to random starting points.

conclusionWe propose a robust and generic optimization scheme, which can be used to optimize the robot placement for robotic ultrasound guidance in radiation therapy. The automatic optimization further mitigates the impact of robotic ultrasound on the treatment plan quality.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresUltrasonographyAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansMalePattern Recognition, AutomatedProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsStochastic ProcessesHeuristic optimizationImage guidanceRadiation therapyRobotic ultrasoundTreatment planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.