ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
Protocol using wide-detector CT with single contrast injection for the aorta and coronary artery: variable helical pitch versus volume scan following helical scan.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two Deep Image Reconstructions for a 320-Row CT: Review of Clinical ApplicationsCurrent medical imaging · 2026Review
- A wide-detector CT protocol for one-stop cardio-cerebrovascular angiography: a technical feasibility study comparing an integrated protocol with conventional two-scan approach.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Refined Nursing Intervention on Coronary CT Imaging Microscopy.Scanning · 2022Article
- Computed tomography imaging using split-bolus contrast injection with volume scan of aortic root and heart for preoperative evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Heart and vessels · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the radiation dose and image quality of two CT protocols using a wide-detector computed tomography (WDCT) scanner with single contrast injection for simultaneous evaluation of the aorta and coronary artery. We retrospectively included 104 consecutive patients who underwent coronary and aorta CT angiography. CT Protocols were divided as follows: protocol I, variable helical pitch scan (VHP, n = 31); protocol II, volume scan for coronary artery following helical scan for aorta (VFH, n = 73). Vascular attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were compared. Image parameters were measured at coronary artery, thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, and iliofemoral arteries. Subjective image quality was assessed by two observers. The patient characteristics between groups were similar (P ≥ 0.384). There were no significant differences in any of the quantitative image parameters between the two groups except for the thoracic aorta. Vascular attenuation (469.2 ± 133.6 vs. 605.9 ± 140.2 HU), CNR (24.8 ± 11.4 vs. 37.3 ± 18.5), and SNR (28.4 ± 12.0 vs. 40.6 ± 19.5 ml) were higher in the VHP protocol (P < 0.001 for each) for covering the thoracic aorta. However, all subjective image scores guaranteed diagnostic image quality. The effective radiation dose of the VFH protocol was reduced to 27.2% compared with that of the VHP protocol (443.8 ± 115.8 vs. 706.7 ± 163.7 mGy·cm, P < 0.001). WDCT with single contrast injection allows assessment of both the coronary artery and aorta. The VFH protocol can reduce the radiation dose and preserve the image quality compared with that of the VHP protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.