Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172386›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2020

Simultaneous Tc-99m PYP/Tl-201 dual-isotope SPECT myocardial imaging in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis.

Balaji Tamarappoo, Yuka Otaki, Osamu Manabe, Mark Hyun, Stephanie Cantu, Yoav Arnson, Heidi Gransar, Sean W Hayes, John D Friedman, Louise Thomson and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of bone scintigraphy imaging for transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Deep Learning-Enabled Quantification ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Attacking the Achilles heel of cardiac amyloid nuclear scintigraphy: How to reduce equivocal and false positive studies.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. What is this image? 2023 image 1 results: Precision high-resolution CZT SPECT imaging to evaluate cardiac aTTR amyloidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Hot spot imaging in cardiovascular diseases: an information statement from SNMMI, ASNC, and EANM.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Pitfalls of the Semi-Quantitative AnalyzingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. 2021 Advocacy Statements for the Role ofActa Cardiologica Sinica · 2021
    Review
  13. Technetium pyrophosphate nuclear scintigraphy for cardiac amyloidosis: Imaging at 1 vs 3 hours and planar vs SPECT/CT.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Balaji TamarappooDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Yuka OtakiDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Osamu ManabeDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Mark HyunDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Stephanie CantuDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Yoav ArnsonDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Heidi GransarDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Sean W HayesDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
John D FriedmanDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Louise ThomsonDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Piotr SlomkaDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Damini DeyDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Robert VescioDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Jignesh PatelDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Daniel S BermanDepartments of Imaging and Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. bermand@cshs.org.

Funding

Detection of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque with a novel 18F-labeled Integrin targeted PET imaging agentR56HL131871 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMARAPPOO, BALAJI K. · 2016 to 2016
$496k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL131871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAssessment of myocardial uptake of Tc-99m-pyrophosphate (Tc-99m PYP) is pivotal in distinguishing transthyretin-associated cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR) from light chain amyloid (AL). It is often difficult to differentiate myocardial uptake from blood pool radioactivity with planar imaging or SPECT. We studied whether simultaneous dual-isotope Tc-99m PYP/Tl-201 SPECT improves assessment of Tc-99m PYP uptake compared to single-isotope SPECT.

methodsSimultaneous Tc-99m PYP/Tl-201 dual-isotope SPECT was acquired in 112 patients studied for possible cardiac amyloidosis. Visual interpretation was performed by two observers on single-isotope followed by dual-isotope SPECT. Heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (H/CL) of myocardial counts quantified by single-isotope and dual-isotope SPECT was compared between ATTR, AL, and no amyloidosis groups.

resultsIn 112 patients (39 ATTR and 26 AL patients, and 47 no amyloidosis), a lower proportion of no amyloidosis and AL patients were classified visually as equivocal with dual-isotope SPECT compared to single-isotope SPECT (2% vs 19%, P = 0.02 and 8% vs 35%, P = 0.04, respectively). H/CL measurements with single-isotope and dual-isotope were lower in AL and no amyloidosis patients vs ATTR patients (P < 0.05). Interobserver agreement of visual assessment was improved with dual-isotope SPECT (P = 0.03). AUCs for detection of ATTR by visual assessment and H/CL quantification were higher with dual-isotope (0.94 and 0.95, respectively) compared to single-isotope SPECT (0.84, P = 0.001 and 0.92, P = 0.02).

conclusionTc-99m PYP/Tl-201 SPECT improves visual differentiation of ATTR and AL amyloidosis compared to single-isotope SPECT. Visual assessment and H/CL quantitation with dual-isotope SPECT provide similar discrimination between patients with ATTR and AL amyloidosis.

Indexed as

RadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m PyrophosphateThallium RadioisotopesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedAged, 80 and overAmyloidosisCardiomyopathiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m PyrophosphateThallium-201Thallium RadioisotopesATTRCardiac amyloidosisSPECTTc-99m-pyrophosphateTl-201transthyretin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.