Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172290›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2019

Tau Imaging in Neurodegenerative Diseases Using Positron Emission Tomography.

Yi Ting Wang, Paul Edison

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Unsupervised [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi Ting WangNeurology Imaging Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, 1st Floor B Block, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Paul EdisonNeurology Imaging Unit, Division of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, 1st Floor B Block, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK. paul.edison@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAbnormal accumulation of tau protein is the main hallmark of tauopathies and is closely associated with neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment, whereas the advance in PET imaging provides a non-invasive detection of tau inclusions in the brain. In this review, we discuss the potential of PET imaging as a biomarker in tauopathies, the latest development of novel tau tracers with new clinical information that has been disclosed, and the opportunities for improving diagnosis and designing clinical trials in the future. RECENT

findingsIn recent years, several first-generation tau PET tracers including [

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyAlzheimer DiseaseAniline CompoundsBiomarkersBrainCarbolinesCognitive DysfunctionHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesQuinolinesTauopathiestau Proteins6-((3-fluoro-2-hydroxy)propoxy)-2-(4-methylaminophenyl)quinoline7-(6-fluoropyridin-3-yl)-5H-pyrido(4,3-b)indoleAniline CompoundsBiomarkersCarbolinesQuinolinestau ProteinsDementiaNeurodegenerationNeurodegenerative diseasesNeurofibrillary tanglesPositron emission tomographyTau

Identifiers

PMID31172290
PMCPMC6554240
OpenAlexW2951632985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.