Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31172219›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019

Teaching learners to raise the roof: a vaginal surgery simulator for apical suspension.

Cassandra K Kisby, Mary V Baker, Isabel C Green, John A Occhino

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cassandra K KisbyDivision of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Kisby.Cassandra@Mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0791-9103
Mary V BakerDepartment of Ob/Gyn, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Isabel C GreenDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
John A OcchinoDivision of Urogynecology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to discuss the importance of apical suspension following vaginal hysterectomy and demonstrate a surgical model to aide in educating learners on a variety of apical suspension procedures.

methodsRates of pelvic organ prolapse are not insignificant following hysterectomy. Re-support of the vaginal apex should be performed at the time of hysterectomy in those with or without a diagnosis of prolapse. Exposure to vaginal apical support procedures may be limited owing to declining rates of vaginal hysterectomy and limited trainee work hours. Surgical models are increasingly being used to supplement operating room experience. The model we present was originally developed for hysterectomy, although its design allows for teaching a variety of apical support procedures that incorporate the uterosacral ligament (USL) for support. We demonstrate performing a USL suspension, internal McCall suture, and modified McCall suture using the model.

resultsThe model is constructed from readily available supplies, is multi-use, and inexpensive. It allows learners to identify relevant anatomy, understand/visualize surgical steps, and practice suturing technique.

conclusionPelvic organ prolapse is common in women, although opportunities to teach apical suspension procedures may be limited. The proposed vaginal surgery simulator can be used to supplement the experience of gynecological surgery trainees with apical suspension procedures.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansPelvic Organ ProlapseMcCall culdoplastyPelvic organ prolapseSurgical simulationUterosacral ligament suspensionVaginal surgeryVaginal vault suspension

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.