Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171985›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2019

The genomic determinants of adaptive evolution in a fungal pathogen.

Jonathan Grandaubert, Julien Y Dutheil, Eva H Stukenbrock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Advances in seed hypoxia research.Plant physiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Enhanced oxidative stress resistance in Ustilago maydis and its implications on the virulence.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jonathan GrandaubertEnvironmental Genomics Group Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology August-Thienemann-Str. 2 24306 Plön Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7235-0550
Julien Y DutheilResearch group Molecular Systems Evolution Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology August-Thienemann-Str. 2 24306 Plön Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7753-4121
Eva H StukenbrockEnvironmental Genomics Group Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology August-Thienemann-Str. 2 24306 Plön Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-3345
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unravelling the strength, frequency, and distribution of selective variants along the genome as well as the underlying factors shaping this distribution are fundamental goals of evolutionary biology. Antagonistic host-pathogen coevolution is thought to be a major driver of genome evolution between interacting species. While rapid evolution of pathogens has been documented in several model organisms, the genetic mechanisms of their adaptation are still poorly understood and debated, particularly the role of sexual reproduction. Here, we apply a population genomic approach to infer genome-wide patterns of selection among 13 isolates of

Indexed as

Adaptationevolutionary ratesgenome evolutionplant pathogenic fungirecombination

Identifiers

PMID31171985
PMCPMC6546377
OpenAlexW2951829171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.