Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Humans Use Predictive Gaze Strategies to Target Waypoints for Steering.

Samuel Tuhkanen, Jami Pekkanen, Paavo Rinkkala, Callum Mole, Richard M Wilkie, Otto Lappi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Can gaze control steering?Journal of vision · 2023
    Article
  9. Behavioral Ethics Ecologies of Human-Artificial Intelligence Systems.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel TuhkanenCognitive Science, Department of Digital Humanities & Helsinki Centre for Digital Humanities (Heldig), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9663-5403
Jami PekkanenCognitive Science, Department of Digital Humanities & Helsinki Centre for Digital Humanities (Heldig), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-8760
Paavo RinkkalaCognitive Science, Department of Digital Humanities & Helsinki Centre for Digital Humanities (Heldig), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Callum MoleSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-6419
Richard M WilkieSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-7171
Otto LappiCognitive Science, Department of Digital Humanities & Helsinki Centre for Digital Humanities (Heldig), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. otto.lappi@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7996-7665
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major unresolved question in understanding visually guided locomotion in humans is whether actions are driven solely by the immediately available optical information (model-free online control mechanisms), or whether internal models have a role in anticipating the future path. We designed two experiments to investigate this issue, measuring spontaneous gaze behaviour while steering, and predictive gaze behaviour when future path information was withheld. In Experiment 1 participants (N = 15) steered along a winding path with rich optic flow: gaze patterns were consistent with tracking waypoints on the future path 1-3 s ahead. In Experiment 2, participants (N = 12) followed a path presented only in the form of visual waypoints located on an otherwise featureless ground plane. New waypoints appeared periodically every 0.75 s and predictably 2 s ahead, except in 25% of the cases the waypoint at the expected location was not displayed. In these cases, there were always other visible waypoints for the participant to fixate, yet participants continued to make saccades to the empty, but predictable, waypoint locations (in line with internal models of the future path guiding gaze fixations). This would not be expected based upon existing model-free online steering control models, and strongly points to a need for models of steering control to include mechanisms for predictive gaze control that support anticipatory path following behaviours.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingFixation, OcularPsychomotor PerformanceVision, OcularAdultAttentionBehaviorComputer SimulationEye MovementsFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedOptic FlowSaccades

Identifiers

PMID31171850
PMCPMC6554351
OpenAlexW2945506992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.