Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171841›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2019

Association between blood pressure variability and the short-term outcome in patients with acute spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Mengqi Yang, Xueying Pan, Zhijian Liang, Xiaoqin Huang, Meiyi Duan, Hui Cai, Guimiao Jiang, Xianlong Wen, Li Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Blood Pressure Variability (BPV): What Clinicians Need to Know a 2025 Expert Consensus Report Endorsed by the Egyptian Society of Cardiology.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of in-hospital blood pressure variability on clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Article
  16. Blood pressure control and adverse outcomes of COVID-19 infection in patients with concomitant hypertension in Wuhan, China.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Article
  17. Blood pressure variability: its relevance for cardiovascular homeostasis and cardiovascular diseases.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mengqi YangDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xueying PanDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhijian LiangDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xiaoqin HuangDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Meiyi DuanDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Hui CaiDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Guimiao JiangDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xianlong WenDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Li ChenDepartment of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China. chenliqfkk@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between the fluctuation in blood pressure (BP) and the early outcomes of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the value of blood pressure variability (BPV) for predicting the short-term outcomes of patients with acute spontaneous SAH. We collected data from 303 patients hospitalized for acute spontaneous SAH. BP values were recorded at admission and subsequently every 2 h during the initial 24 h of hospitalization. BPV was determined as the standard deviation (SD), the difference between the maximum and the minimum (ΔBP), the coefficient of variation (CV), and successive variation (SV). The outcome at discharge was assessed according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The association between BPV and the outcome was identified by multivariable analysis. The findings showed that the parameters of systolic BPV were independently associated with the outcome in a graded fashion. The odds ratios (OR) for the highest tertiles were as follows: SD 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-40.4), ΔBP 4.4 (95% CI, 1.6-11.9), CV 16.4 (95% CI, 5.6-48.8), SV 15.8 (95% CI, 5.3-46.9). However, there was no association between a poor outcome and diastolic BPV (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, systolic BPV within the first 24 h after admission was independently associated with the outcomes in SAH patients; the greater the variability was, the worse the outcome.

Indexed as

Blood PressureGlasgow Outcome ScaleAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSubarachnoid HemorrhageBlood pressure variabilityOutcomeSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.