ArticleScientific reports2019
Cellular morphological changes detected by laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy associated with clinical outcome in fungal keratitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond the surface: a comprehensive review of corneal endotheliitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical Characteristics and In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Study in Candida Keratitis.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- In-vivo corneal confocal microscopy: Imaging analysis, biological insights and future directions.Communications biology · 2023Review
- A deep transfer learning framework for the automated assessment of corneal inflammation on in vivo confocal microscopy images.PloS one · 2021Article
- The Clinical Value of Explainable Deep Learning for Diagnosing Fungal Keratitis UsingFrontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
HRT3 in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images may indicate clinical outcome, but few studies have analysed this in fungal keratitis (FK). Adults with FK (diameter ≥3 mm) presenting to Aravind Eye Hospital, India from 2012-3 were enrolled prospectively. IVCM was performed at baseline, days 7, 14 and 21 post-enrolment (+/- 3 days where possible). Specific morphologies were identified in IVCM images by a grader masked to microbiology and clinical outcome (defined as good: healed/improving, or poor: enlarged ulcer, perforation or transplant/glue). Associations with final visit outcome assessed using logistic regression. 143 FK participants were enrolled; 87 had good outcome, 56 had poor outcome. Poor outcomes were associated with stellate interconnected cellular processes with no visible nuclei (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.03-5.06, p = 0.043) in baseline IVCM images, and fungal filaments (OR 6.48, 95% CI:2.50-16.78, p < 0.001) or honeycomb distribution of inflammatory cells (OR 5.24, 95% CI: 1.44-19.06, p = 0.012) in final visit images. Fungal filaments (OR 3.61, 95% CI:1.64-7.95, p = 0.001), stromal dendritiform cells (OR 2.88, 95% CI:1.17-7.11, p = 0.022), or stellate cellular processes with no visible nuclei (OR 2.09, 95% CI:1.14-3.82, p = 0.017) were associated with poor outcome if not in baseline but present in final visit images. IVCM can reveal morphological changes associated with clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.