ArticleScientific reports2019
Model of a Support Vector Machine to Assess the Functional Cure for Surgery of Intermittent Exotropia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors of Residual Exotropia After Surgery in Patients with Intermittent and Sensory Exotropia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence in strabismus management: current research landscape and future directions.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Cortical Deficits are Correlated with Impaired Stereopsis in Patients with Strabismus.Neuroscience bulletin · 2023Article
- Advances in artificial intelligence models and algorithms in the field of optometry.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper the optimum timing for the postoperative functional cure of basic intermittent exotropia is explored based on support vector machine (SVM). One hundred and thirty-two patients were recruited in this prospective cross-sectional study with 6 months of follow-up. Examinations included angle of deviation, central and peripheral fusion, controllability, and near and distance stereopsis. Influencing factors of postoperative alignment and stereopsis were analyzed with a chi-squared test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. At 6 months post-operation, there were 84 successful procedures for the angle of deviation, with 4 overcorrections and 44 undercorrections. The success rate was 63.6%. The angle of deviation on postoperative day 1 was the only significant associated factor. One hundred and thirty patients had normal near stereoacuity, 60 had normal distance stereoacuity according to a Functional Visual Analyzer assessment, and 108 had normal stereoacuity as assessed by the Frisby Davis Distance (FD2) stereotest. The age of onset and preoperative distance stereoacuity with FD2 were the influencing factors of postoperative distance stereopsis restoration. The accuracy of this method of SVM was 82.1%. The angle of deviation for distance on postoperative day 1 was the only significant factor that correlated with alignment at 6 months post-operation, and the model of SVM was useful to determine the optimal time of the postoperative functional cure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.