Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171710›Full record

Observational studyBMJ quality & safety2020

Missed nursing care in newborn units: a cross-sectional direct observational study.

David Gathara, George Serem, Georgina A V Murphy, Alfred Obengo, Edna Tallam, Debra Jackson, Sharon Brownie, Mike English

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

David GatharaPublic Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya DGathara@kemri-wellcome.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0958-0713
George SeremPublic Health Research, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Georgina A V MurphyGlobal Health, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alfred ObengoNational Nurses Association of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Edna TallamRegistration and Licensing, Nursing Council of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Debra JacksonNursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sharon BrownieNursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University School of Nursing and Midwifery East Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishPublic Health Research, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEGates Foundation · USGriffith University · AUNational Nurses Association of Kenya · KEUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M015386/1Medical Research Council MR/R018510/1Wellcome Trust 097170Wellcome Trust 207522/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved hospital care is needed to reduce newborn mortality in low/middle-income countries (LMIC). Nurses are essential to the delivery of safe and effective care, but nurse shortages and high patient workloads may result in missed care. We aimed to examine nursing care delivered to sick newborns and identify missed care using direct observational methods.

methodsA cross-sectional study using direct-observational methods for 216 newborns admitted in six health facilities in Nairobi, Kenya, was used to determine which tasks were completed. We report the frequency of tasks done and develop a nursing care index (NCI), an unweighted summary score of nursing tasks done for each baby, to explore how task completion is related to organisational and newborn characteristics.

resultsNursing tasks most commonly completed were handing over between shifts (97%), checking and where necessary changing diapers (96%). Tasks with lowest completion rates included nursing review of newborns (38%) and assessment of babies on phototherapy (15%). Overall the mean NCI was 60% (95% CI 58% to 62%), at least 80% of tasks were completed for only 14% of babies. Private sector facilities had a median ratio of babies to nurses of 3, with a maximum of 7 babies per nurse. In the public sector, the median ratio was 19 babies and a maximum exceeding 25 babies per nurse. In exploratory multivariable analyses, ratios of ≥12 babies per nurse were associated with a 24-point reduction in the mean NCI compared with ratios of ≤3 babies per nurse.

conclusionA significant proportion of nursing care is missed with potentially serious effects on patient safety and outcomes in this LMIC setting. Given that nurses caring for fewer babies on average performed more of the expected tasks, addressing nursing is key to ensuring delivery of essential aspects of care as part of improving quality and safety.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornKenyaNursing Staff, HospitalPrivate SectorPublic SectorQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health Carehealth services researchnursespatient safetyquality measurementstandards of care

Identifiers

PMID31171710
PMCPMC6923939
OpenAlexW2949647519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.