Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171685›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2019

Ethics of inclusion: Cultivate trust in precision medicine.

Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Stephanie M Fullerton, Aliya Saperstein, Janet K Shim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The rise of diversity terminology in biomedical research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unbounding ELSI: The Ongoing Work of Centering Equity and Justice.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Health equality, race and pharmacogenomics.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  20. The Ethics of Consent in a Shifting Genomic Ecosystem.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandra Soo-Jin LeeDivision of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities and Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. sandra.lee@columbia.edu.
Stephanie M FullertonDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aliya SapersteinDepartment of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Janet K ShimDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

Understanding the Expectations and Needs of Diverse Communities for Navigating Research ResultsR01HG010330 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, SANDRA SOO-JIN, SHIM, JANET K · 2018 to 2021
$2.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Ethics, MedicalHumansInformed ConsentPatient SelectionPrecision MedicineTrust

Identifiers

PMID31171685
PMCPMC7261394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.