Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171607›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Reward Expectation Modulates Local Field Potentials, Spiking Activity and Spike-Field Coherence in the Primary Motor Cortex.

Junmo An, Taruna Yadav, John P Hessburg, Joseph T Francis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junmo AnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204.ORCID 0000-0003-4548-2763
Taruna YadavDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204.ORCID 0000-0002-2347-0537
John P HessburgDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Robert F Furchgott Center for Neural and Behavioral Science, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203.
Joseph T FrancisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204 joey199us@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-0452
University of Houston · USState University of New York · US

Funding

Towards an Autonomous Brain Machine Interface: Integrating Sensorimotor Reward Modulation and Reinforcement LearningR01NS092894 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI FRANCIS, JOSEPH T · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward modulation (M1) could be exploited in developing an autonomously updating brain-computer interface (BCI) based on a reinforcement learning (RL) architecture. For an autonomously updating RL-based BCI system, we would need a reward prediction error, or a state-value representation from the user's neural activity, which the RL-BCI agent could use to update its BCI decoder. In order to understand the multifaceted effects of reward on M1 activity, we investigated how neural spiking, oscillatory activities and their functional interactions are modulated by conditioned stimuli related reward expectation. To do so, local field potentials (LFPs) and single/multi-unit activities were recorded simultaneously and bilaterally from M1 cortices while four non-human primates (NHPs) performed cued center-out reaching or grip force tasks either manually using their right arm/hand or observed passively. We found that reward expectation influenced the strength of α (8-14 Hz) power, α-γ comodulation, α spike-field coherence (SFC), and firing rates (FRs) in general in M1. Furthermore, we found that an increase in α-band power was correlated with a decrease in neural spiking activity, that FRs were highest at the trough of the α-band cycle and lowest at the peak of its cycle. These findings imply that α oscillations modulated by reward expectation have an influence on spike FR and spike timing during both reaching and grasping tasks in M1. These LFP, spike, and spike-field interactions could be used to follow the M1 neural state in order to enhance BCI decoding (An et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2018).

Indexed as

Action PotentialsBrain WavesRewardAnimalsCuesFemaleHand StrengthMacaca mulattaMacaca radiataMaleMotor CortexPsychomotor PerformanceSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedbrain computer interfacemirror neuronsprimary motor cortexpulsed inhibitionrewardα power

Identifiers

PMID31171607
PMCPMC6595440
OpenAlexW2949295961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.