Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171547›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Development and validation of the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire: an observational study in Italy.

Flavia Faccio, Sara Gandini, Chiara Renzi, Chiara Fioretti, Chiara Crico, Gabriella Pravettoni

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The influence of family resilience and benefit finding on the financial toxicity of primary caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Classifying family resilience trajectory of patients undergoing lung cancer surgery: a longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Family mutuality enhances the family resilience of colorectal cancer patients through positive family functioning.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Association analysis of family resilience with sleep quality and hope levels in post-modified radical mastectomy breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Editorial: New insights into stress coping and resilience.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Flavia FaccioDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0231-9707
Sara GandiniDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Chiara RenziApplied Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy.
Chiara FiorettiDepartment of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Chiara CricoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Gabriella PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDevelop and validate an instrument to assess family resilience and, more specifically, the family dynamics and resources, estimating the adaptation flexibility to cancer disease. Cohesion, communication, coping style and relational style were considered as critical functional areas in the construction of the instrument.

designTwo cross-sectional studies. Study 1: identification of factorial structure of the questionnaire in two samples with different cancer sites. Study 2: validation of the questionnaire in patients with cancer in two different phases of their therapeutic pathway. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingA total of 213 patients with a histologically confirmed non-metastatic breast or prostate cancer and 209 caregivers were recruited for the two studies from an oncological hospital in Italy. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Resilience Scale for Adults and the Family Resilience (FaRE) Questionnaire, developed by the researchers, were administered to all patients and caregivers who gave consent.

resultsIn study 1, the 60-item version of the FaRE Questionnaire underwent discriminant and construct validity, internal consistency and factorial analysis. Comparisons between patient and caregiver populations showed that patients perceived higher levels of family resources (p=0.048) and that patients with prostate cancer perceived less social support compared with patients with breast cancer (p=0.002). Factor analysis demonstrated four domains: communication and cohesion, perceived social support, perceived family coping, and religiousness and spirituality. In study 2, the validity and factorial structure of the final scale, composed of 24 items, were confirmed. The Cronbach alpha of all subscales was above 82. Normative values for patients with breast cancer can provide indications of family resilience levels.

conclusionsPreliminary findings showed acceptable psychometric properties for the FaRE Questionnaire to evaluate family resilience in oncological patients and their caregivers. Further research should test its sensibility to change to assess its use as a psychoemotional monitoring tool and its validity in other medical contexts.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalAdultBreast NeoplasmsCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnairesfamily adaptationfamily resilienceoncologystress and copingsurveys and questionnairessystems theory

Identifiers

PMID31171547
PMCPMC6561460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.