Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171042›Full record

ArticleCancer communications (London, England)2019

Modelling the probability of erroneous negative lymph node staging in patients with colon cancer.

Carlos Fortea-Sanchis, Erica Forcadell-Comes, David Martínez-Ramos, Javier Escrig-Sos

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer communications (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carlos Fortea-SanchisDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Consorci Hospitalari Provincial de Castelló, Castelló, Spain. carlosfortea@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7635-740X
Erica Forcadell-ComesOropesa Health Center, Carrer de Torreblanca, 14, 12594, Oropesa, Castelló, Spain.
David Martínez-RamosDepartment of Surgery, Hospital General de Castelló, Castelló, Spain.
Javier Escrig-SosDepartment of Surgery, Hospital General de Castelló, Castelló, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients in who with insufficient number of analysed lymph nodes (LNs) are more likely to receive an incorrect LN staging. The ability to calculate the overall probability of undiagnosed LN involvement errors in these patients could be very useful for approximating the real patient prognosis and for giving possible indications for adjuvant treatments. The objective of this work was to establish the predictive capacity and prognostic discriminative ability of the final error probability (FEP) among patients with colon cancer and with a potentially incorrectly-staged LN-negative disease.

methodsThis was a retrospective multicentric population study carried out between January 2004 and December 2007. We used a mathematical model based on Bayes' theorem to calculate the probability of LN involvement given a FEP test result. Cumulative sum graphs were used to calculate risk groups and the survival rates were calculated, by month, using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsA total of 548 patients were analysed and classified into three risk groups according to their FEP score: low-risk (FEP < 2%), intermediate-risk (FEP 2%-15%), and high-risk (FEP > 15%). Patients with LN involvement had the lowest overall survival rate when compared to the three risk groups. This difference was statistically significant for the low- and intermediate-risk groups (P = 0.002 and P = 0.004, respectively), but high-risk group presented similar survival curves to pN+ group (P = 0.505). In terms of disease-free survival, the high-risk group presented similar curves to the intermediate-risk group until approximately 60 months' follow-up (P = 0.906). After 80 months' follow-up, the curve of high-risk group coincided with that of the pN+ group (P = 0.172). Finally, we summarized the FEP according to the number of analysed LNs and accompanied by a contour plot which represents its calculation graphically.

conclusionsThe application of Bayes' theorem in the calculation of FEP is useful to delimit risk subgroups from among patients without LN involvement.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesBayes’ theoremColon cancerFinal error probabilityLymph node stagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31171042
PMCPMC6554951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.