Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171011›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2019

Improving care for elderly patients living with polypharmacy: protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in community-based primary care practices in Canada.

M Greiver, S Dahrouge, P O'Brien, D Manca, M T Lussier, J Wang, F Burge, M Grandy, A Singer, M Twohig and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03689049 (SPIDER), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03689049 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

SPIDER: A Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research - A Research and Quality Improvement Collaboration Supporting Practices in Improving Care for Complex Elderly Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Toronto Practice Based Research NetworkRan2018 to 2027Enrolled104ConditionsPolypharmacy, Inappropriate Prescribing, Aged, Primary Health CareArmsSPIDER, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A School-Based Randomized Controlled Trial to Promote Cycling to School in Adolescents: The PACO Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

M GreiverNorth York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada. michelle.greiver@nygh.on.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8957-0285
S DahrougeDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1R 6M1, Canada.
P O'BrienDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada.
D MancaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 8303 - 112 Street NW, 610 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada.
M T LussierDepartment of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Montreal, 1755 René Laennec, Bureau DS-079, Laval, Québec, H7M3L9, Canada.
J WangNorth York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada.
F BurgeDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 8F, 8525 Abbie J Lane Building, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E2, Canada.
M GrandyDepartment of Family Medicine, Dalhousie University, 8F, 8525 Abbie J Lane Building, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E2, Canada.
A SingerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, D009 - 780 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada.
M TwohigNorth York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada.
R MoineddinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada.
S KaliaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada.
B AliarzadehDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada.
N IversFamily Practice Health Centre and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1B2, Canada.
S GariesDepartment of family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, G012 Health Sciences Centre, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N1, Canada.
J P TurnerFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, 2900 Edouard Montpetit Boulevard, Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1J4, Canada.
B FarrellDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, 85 Primrose Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1R 6M1, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElders living with polypharmacy may be taking medications that do not benefit them. Polypharmacy can be associated with elevated risks of poor health, reduced quality of life, high care costs, and persistently complex care needs. While many medications could be problematic, this project targets medications that should be deprescribed for most elders and for which guidelines and evidence-based deprescribing tools are available. These are termed potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) and are as follows: proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and sulfonylureas. Implementation strategies for deprescribing PIPs in complex older patient populations are needed.

methodsThis will be a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices across Canada. Eligible practices provide comprehensive primary care and have at least one physician that consents to participate. Community-dwelling patients aged 65 years and older with ten or more unique medication prescriptions in the past year will be included. The objective is to assess whether the intervention reduces targeted PIPs for these patients compared with usual care. The intervention, Structured Process Informed by Data, Evidence and Research (SPIDER), is a collaboration between quality improvement (QI) and research programs. Primary care teams will form interprofessional Learning Collaboratives and work with QI coaches to review electronic medical record data provided by their regional Practice Based Research Networks (PBRNs), identify areas of improvement, and develop and implement changes. The study will be tested for feasibility in three PBRNs (Toronto, Montreal, and Edmonton) using prospective single-arm mixed methods. Findings will then guide a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial in five PBRNs (Calgary, Winnipeg, Ottawa, Montreal, and Halifax). Seven practices per PBRN will be recruited for each arm. The analysis will be by intention to treat. Ten percent of patients who have at least one PIP at baseline will be randomly selected to participate in the assessment of patient experience and self-reported outcomes. Qualitative methods will be used to explore patient and physician experience and evaluate SPIDER's processes.

conclusionWe are testing SPIDER in a primary care population with complex care needs. This could provide a widely applicable model for care improvement.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03689049 ; registered September 28, 2018.

Indexed as

PolypharmacyPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaHumansInappropriate PrescribingMalePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignAgedClinical trials, randomizedElectronic health recordsInappropriate prescribingPolypharmacyPrimary health careQuality improvementSocial facilitation

Identifiers

PMID31171011
PMCPMC6551894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.