Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31171004›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2019

Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review.

Maji Hailemariam, Tatiana Bustos, Barrett Montgomery, Rolando Barajas, Luther B Evans, Amy Drahota

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 203 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maji HailemariamCollege of Human Medicine, Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA. maji.debena@hc.msu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-9637
Tatiana BustosDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Barrett MontgomeryCollege of Human Medicine, Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Rolando BarajasCollege of Human Medicine, Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Luther B EvansCollege of Human Medicine, Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA.
Amy DrahotaDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

The Flint Center for Health Equity SolutionsU54MD011227 · NIMHD · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FURR-HOLDEN, C. DEBRA M. · 2016 to 2020
$10.7M
Scaling up a family strengthening EBP to reduce child disruptive behavior problems in SSAU19MH110001 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOAGWOOD, KIMBERLY E., MCKAY, MARY MCKERNAN · 2016 to 2020
$3.9M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD011227NIMHD NIH HHS U54MD011227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustainability of evidence-based interventions (EBI) remains a challenge for public health community-based institutions. The conceptual definition of sustainment is not universally agreed upon by researchers and practitioners, and strategies utilized to facilitate sustainment of EBI are not consistently reported in published literature. Given these limitations in the field, a systematic review was conducted to summarize the existing evidence supporting discrete sustainment strategies for public health EBIs and facilitating and hindering factors of sustainment.

methodsWe searched PsychINFO, Embase, ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The initial search was run in March 2017 and an update was done in March 2019. Study eligibility criteria included (a) public health evidence-based interventions, (b) conducted in the community or community-based settings, and (c) reported outcomes related to EBI sustainment. Details characterizing the study setting, design, target population, and type of EBI sustained were extracted.

resultsA total of 26 articles published from 2004 to 2019 were eligible for data extraction. Overall, the importance of sustainability was acknowledged across all of the studies. However, only seven studies presented a conceptual definition of sustainment explicitly within the text. Six of the included studies reported specific sustainment strategies that were used to facilitate the sustainment of EBI. Only three of the studies reported their activities related to sustainment by referencing a sustainment framework. Multiple facilitators (i.e., adaptation/alignment, funding) and barriers (i.e., limited funding, limited resources) were identified as influencing EBI sustainment. The majority (n = 20) of the studies were conducted in high-income countries. Studies from low-income countries were mostly naturalistic. All of the studies from low-income countries reported lack of funding as a hindrance to sustainment. IMPLICATION FOR DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH: Literature focused on sustainment of public health EBIs should present an explicit definition of the concept. Better reporting of the framework utilized, steps followed, and adaptations made to sustain the intervention might contribute to standardizing and developing the concept. Moreover, encouraging longitudinal dissemination and implementation (D&I) research especially in low-income countries might help strengthen D&I research capacity in public health settings.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Plan ImplementationPublic HealthHumansEvidence-based interventionsSustainabilitySustainmentSustainment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31171004
PMCPMC6554955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.